對罵2

想聊就聊,分享自己的世界,可以讓人生更美。〈嚴禁政治、爭議性話題及個人私事。〉

版主: norman

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#21 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週四 3月 24, 2011 10:33 pm

taichiskiing 寫:That will be too easy, at $5,000usd per run, don't think that you can affort it, and Heavenly Eastbowl Woods covers all your requirements, double black trees on the top, double black moguls in the middle, straight away/groomed at the bottom, and easy in and easy out, so it is one run covers them all. The runs I specified are pretty much what you can expect typical terrain/skiing at Heavenly, so choose carefully, your money.

And you still have to qualify the double diamond run first. To qualify the double diamond run, do what I did, wear a helmet camera, make a reference shot to the double diamond entry, then make a run, top to bottom, none-stop. After you've qualified, then you can continue to talk about PK with me. Before that, your Whistler group remains a shameless BS group.

:)
IS
Getting stuck on your「小人短戚戚」, eh? :face (293): :face (293): :face (293):



pku
文章: 3821
註冊時間: 週日 5月 30, 2010 1:02 pm

#22 回覆: Interski 2011

文章 pku » 週四 3月 24, 2011 11:14 pm

taichiskiing 寫:對,你們 Whistler group, 無恥.

:)
IS
Since you have been voted as the most 無恥 guy in the forum, no run can be as close to that never especially Norman stop boosting his skiing and you keep on showing your slow, boring video of you skiing. Tranversing, and hunt for the turn

I think now to say Taichiskiing 無恥大師, even Admin, crasy boy and Norman won't say anything.

If Admin like to remove this one, I don't mind and I'll stop but pleasere move taichiskiing's post of his dirty old mouth first.

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#23 回覆: Quiz

文章 CrazyBoy » 週五 3月 25, 2011 9:49 am

beg 寫:那請問大師要滑多少天数オ能達到以上的化境? :face (46): :face (46): :face (46):
beg 寫:叫人大師己是人身攻擊,..... :face (334):
:face (41):

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#24 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 CrazyBoy » 週五 3月 25, 2011 9:53 am

beg 寫:對、神經衰弱會変CrazyBoy、CrazyBoy會変傻逼、傻逼辯不過人會移走我的發文。 :face (334): :face (334): :face (334):
本來不想再回這一句話,但不回你還會當真,所以只好再回一下。

你又在亂誣賴人了 :face (331): ,如果是我移文,我遭天打雷劈。 :face (41):

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#25 回覆: Quiz

文章 beg » 週五 3月 25, 2011 3:20 pm

CrazyBoy 寫: :face (41):
妳硬是小知扮大師,那是沒法的。妳人身攻擊別人時、期望人家回妳ー個吻嗎? :fm (37):
最後由 beg 於 週五 3月 25, 2011 3:52 pm 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#26 回覆: Quiz

文章 CrazyBoy » 週五 3月 25, 2011 4:18 pm

beg 寫:妳硬是小知扮大師,那是沒法的。妳人身攻擊別人時、期望人家回妳ー個吻嗎? :fm (37):
你又在見鬼了。 :face (41):

你問的問題也不合理,達到什麼境界,裏面什麼境界都沒有,根本是胡亂問。 :face (41):

自己講的話反駁不了,反而在講五四三。 :face (331):

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#27 回覆: Interski 2011

文章 taichiskiing » 週五 3月 25, 2011 9:17 pm

pku 寫:Since you have been voted as the most 無恥 guy in the forum, no run can be as close to that never especially Norman stop boosting his skiing and you keep on showing your slow, boring video of you skiing. Tranversing, and hunt for the turn
What makes 無恥 is you have yet to prove you can ski powder, trees, or double diamond terrain, but never ending boasting that you know better, and you've called norman's never-ending boasting 無恥, and you are not the same, 無恥? Yes, that's 無恥. What you see on my "boring video" only reflects on your little knowledge doesn't know how watch video or do the proper MA, or simply, shameless denial.
I think now to say Taichiskiing 無恥大師, even Admin, crasy boy and Norman won't say anything.
Guess they are not as shameless as you Whistler Group. So, “所以是你們 Whistler group 用“婆婦罵街”方式來羸辯論?對,“面是人家給,架是自己丟!””
If Admin like to remove this one, I don't mind and I'll stop but pleasere move taichiskiing's post of his dirty old mouth first.
The difference between my words and yours is my words tell the truth, and you Whistler Group only know how to lie and to copycat/跟屁蟲, and your copycat is just that, copycat, which is what makes you "dirty old mouth" at the first place. And that's what makes you Whistler group 無恥.

You are what you do, so that's how you being called, and only you can stop doing what you do, so the beating continues.

:)
IS

pku
文章: 3821
註冊時間: 週日 5月 30, 2010 1:02 pm

#28 回覆: Interski 2011

文章 pku » 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:02 am

taichiskiing 寫:What makes 無恥 is you have yet to prove you can ski powder, trees, or double diamond terrain, but never ending boasting that you know better, and you've called norman's never-ending boasting 無恥, and you are not the same, 無恥? Yes, that's 無恥. What you see on my "boring video" only reflects on your little knowledge doesn't know how watch video or do the proper MA, or simply, shameless denial.



Guess they are not as shameless as you Whistler Group. So, “所以是你們 Whistler group 用“婆婦罵街”方式來羸辯論?對,“面是人家給,架是自己丟!””



The difference between my words and yours is my words tell the truth, and you Whistler Group only know how to lie and to copycat/跟屁蟲, and your copycat is just that, copycat, which is what makes you "dirty old mouth" at the first place. And that's what makes you Whistler group 無恥.

You are what you do, so that's how you being called, and only you can stop doing what you do, so the beating continues.

:)
IS
Admin,

Thanks!

Taichiskiing 無恥大師

無恥Taichiskiing

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#29 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:02 pm

taichiskiing 寫:為了爭個自己口顛,「傾家當產」有所不惜? Lucky you, I don't do "gapper's challenge," you're still going to lose, and the run you did does not meet the "all-mountain ALPINE skiing" criteria, but the run I've shown does.



What a lame excuse. You don't need the helmet to use a helmet cam; there are head straps or body harness for it. If you don't know how to use a helmet cam, ask B2L2. And you better start to learn wearing helmet, you'd need it to go where we might be going,

YouTube - Flatboarding/Line-skiing: off-piste, Maggie's canyon, right traverse, Heavenly





The same question I might have asked you, given you Canadian have a smaller dollars; nevertheless, why bother? We "non-gappers"/真人 說話算數, need no proof. The bet was "one" run to see which one of us is "faster," not "better," for which you have already lost, and all I need is to win the first around, and yes, you're going to lose them all. That's your requested proof. Game?

:)
IS
snowrider 寫:How about let's close this thread because the event will never happen?!

The obvious winner is PKU, but there is nothing wrong with Taichiskiing. We cannot blame someone who enjoys or feels good about him/herself. If you tell a frog that he is ugly, he won't agree. He would tell you that a she-frog told him that he was very handsome. It's just about different standards.

Let's open another thread to discuss what a *good skiing* is.
TAICHI 己被判輸了、頼帳不付錢還在烏咀。jiaada13jiaada17
最後由 beg 於 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:09 pm 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#30 回覆: Interski 2011

文章 taichiskiing » 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:28 pm

pku 寫:Admin,

Thanks!

Taichiskiing 無恥大師

無恥Taichiskiing
“So, 所以是你們 Whistler group 用“婆婦罵街”方式來羸辯論?對,“面是人家給,架是自己丟!””

原來你們 Whistler Group 是 "human computer virus" breeding group,謝謝“無恥”的示範‧這也簡單,當你也變成 "human computer virus" 的以後,我是不會回你們 Whistler Group 的發言的—「糞土之牆,不可污也」。

:)
IS

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#31 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:29 pm

CrazyBoy 寫:你又在見鬼了。 :face (41):

你問的問題也不合理,達到什麼境界,裏面什麼境界都沒有,根本是胡亂問。 :face (41):

自己講的話反駁不了,反而在講五四三。 :face (331):

你又在若至了、妳不是答了嗎、妳的最高境界是什麼境界都沒有。自己講的話反駁不了,反而在講五四運動。 :hikids (88): :hikids (10): jiaada17

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#32 回覆: Interski 2011

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 1:36 pm

taichiskiing 寫:“So, 所以是你們 Whistler group 用“婆婦罵街”方式來羸辯論?對,“面是人家給,架是自己丟!””

原來你們 Whistler Group 是 "human computer virus" breeding group,謝謝“無恥”的示範‧這也簡單,當你也變成 "human computer virus" 的以後,我是不會回你們 Whistler Group 的發言的—「糞土之牆,不可污也」。

:)
IS
“婆婦罵街”的太極好好、妳説不回話無数次了、那次オ是真的。jiaada14

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#33 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 CrazyBoy » 週六 3月 26, 2011 2:18 pm

beg 寫:你又在若至了、妳不是答了嗎、妳的最高境界是什麼境界都沒有。自己講的話反駁不了,反而在講五四運動。 :hikids (88): :hikids (10): jiaada17
謝謝,我根本不需要反駁,你就幫我澄清說我像太極張三豐一樣,最高境界就是什麼境界都沒有。

即然知道還不好好學,白痴去吧!jiaada17jiaada14 :face (298):
最後由 CrazyBoy 於 週六 3月 26, 2011 2:20 pm 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#34 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 2:37 pm

CrazyBoy 寫:謝謝,我根本不需要反駁,你就幫我澄清說我像太極張三豐一樣,最高境界就是什麼境界都沒有。

即然知道還不好好學,白痴去吧!jiaada17jiaada14 :face (298):
對、妳根本不需要反駁、祝妳早日達成妳的白痴最高境界。jiaada15ajiaada2jiaada17

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#35 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 CrazyBoy » 週六 3月 26, 2011 3:06 pm

beg 寫:對、妳根本不需要反駁、祝妳早日達成妳的白痴最高境界。jiaada15ajiaada2jiaada17
你又在耍白痴了,不是無境界嗎?哪來的最高境界。 :face (293): :hw (0):

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#36 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 4:47 pm

CrazyBoy 寫:你又在耍白痴了,不是無境界嗎?哪來的最高境界。 :face (293): :hw (0):
本來不想再回這一句話,但不回你還會耍白痴了,所以只好再回一下。弱智就是妳的最高境界。 :hw (0): :hw (0): :hw (0):

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#37 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 CrazyBoy » 週六 3月 26, 2011 5:10 pm

beg 寫:本來不想再回這一句話,但不回你還會耍白痴了,所以只好再回一下。弱智就是妳的最高境界。 :hw (0): :hw (0): :hw (0):
果然是番到最高點,番來番去,連無境界還是最高境界都分不清楚,這正是你的特色。 :face (293): :hw (0):

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#38 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週六 3月 26, 2011 5:17 pm

CrazyBoy 寫:果然是番到最高點,番來番去,連無境界還是最高境界都分不清楚,這正是你的特色。 :face (293): :hw (0):
果然是弱智到最高點,番來番去,連無境界是最妳高境界都分不清楚,這正是你的弱智特色。 :face (293): :hw (0): [/QUOTE]

CrazyBoy
文章: 204
註冊時間: 週六 2月 19, 2011 12:37 pm

#39 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 CrazyBoy » 週六 3月 26, 2011 6:00 pm

beg 寫:果然是弱智到最高點,番來番去,連無境界是最妳高境界都分不清楚,這正是你的弱智特色。 :face (293): :hw (0):
你繼續番也改變不了「番到搞不清楚就是你的特色」!後面再番就你自己一個人繼續番吧,因為再多番幾遍也一樣,「番到搞不清楚就是你的特色」! :face (293): jiaada14 :hw (0):

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#40 回覆: 為什麼 wedge 不好? 有什麼不好?

文章 beg » 週日 3月 27, 2011 1:26 am

CrazyBoy 寫:你繼續番也改變不了「番到搞不清楚就是你的特色」!後面再番就你自己一個人繼續番吧,因為再多番幾遍也一樣,「番到搞不清楚就是你的特色」! :face (293): jiaada14 :hw (0):
對,你繼續番也改變不了「番到搞不清楚妳是誰就是你的特色」!後面再番就你自己一個人繼續番吧,因為再多番幾遍也一樣,「番到搞不清楚就妳是誰是你的特色」!: :hw (0): jiaada14jiaada14

回覆文章