Quiz

管他是好咖還是怪咖,只要是咖就能發言,有任何技術問題,在此討論就對啦。

版主: norman

pku
文章: 3821
註冊時間: 週日 5月 30, 2010 1:02 pm

#81 回覆: Quiz

文章 pku » 週二 3月 29, 2011 2:33 pm

normanding 寫:我什麼時候講練直排輪馬上就能滑得像義大利示範片?

我只說我能用直排輪練出我要的動作,這次出門我也只滑三天多一點而已,你想要期待什麼? :face (4):

等你找得到有人能以同樣的滑雪天數跟我有一樣的進步的人再來說吧?現在我光在整理過的滑道的動作做就足夠贏你們了,下次不管多久後再出門滑,就算一樣只滑三天,我的動作只會更漂亮,比起滑很久還不什麼優美的動作好多了,如果要比快,不是跟我比,而是應該去參加比賽跟選手比。

我第一天沒拍饅頭的影片,要是有拍的話,我把兩段影片放在一起給你們看,你們就會知道我的第一天(這一天我過饅頭雙腳都是打開變成半制動下山的)跟第四天的動作差有多多,你就不會有自信說我還要練十年每年60天才能滑得多好了,少以你自己當例子來看我的進步。 :face (343):
The better one are, the harder one can improve. you are still an intermediate skier so the improvement is a bit more obvious. Skiing 60 days for 10 years is not a lot. If one can ski really good after 10 years of skiing, he's already pretty talented.

I heard a guy get his CSIA L1 after 10 days of skiing and people can get CSIA level 2 in 6o days . My friend got his CSIA L2 in his third year of skiing ( around 100 days skiing)

Your skiing may be a bit quicker than average but nothing to boost about.

You may be able to pass CSIA L1 on our local mountain since they don't take you to the ungroomed but if you take the course on Whistler and you skiingon ungroomed is so shitty, the chance of passing is ????????



beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#82 回覆: Quiz

文章 beg » 週二 3月 29, 2011 2:45 pm

normanding 寫:我什麼時候講練直排輪馬上就能滑得像義大利示範片?

我只說我能用直排輪練出我要的動作,這次出門我也只滑三天多一點而已,你想要期待什麼? :face (4):

等你找得到有人能以同樣的滑雪天數跟我有一樣的進步的人再來說吧?現在我光在整理過的滑道的動作做就足夠贏你們了,下次不管多久後再出門滑,就算一樣只滑三天,我的動作只會更漂亮,比起滑很久還不什麼優美的動作好多了,如果要比快,不是跟我比,而是應該去參加比賽跟選手比。

我第一天沒拍饅頭的影片,要是有拍的話,我把兩段影片放在一起給你們看,你們就會知道我的第一天(這一天我過饅頭雙腳都是打開變成半制動下山的)跟第四天的動作差有多多,你就不會有自信說我還要練十年每年60天才能滑得多好了,少以你自己當例子來看我的進步。 :face (343):
習慣了妳以 crazy boy 發言,大師又把他滅口了嗎? :face (334):

頭像
normanding
文章: 80
註冊時間: 週一 9月 13, 2010 9:47 am

#83 回覆: Quiz

文章 normanding » 週二 3月 29, 2011 3:10 pm

pku 寫:The better one are, the harder one can improve. you are still an intermediate skier so the improvement is a bit more obvious. Skiing 60 days for 10 years is not a lot. If one can ski really good after 10 years of skiing, he's already pretty talented.

I heard a guy get his CSIA L1 after 10 days of skiing and people can get CSIA level 2 in 6o days . My friend got his CSIA L2 in his third year of skiing ( around 100 days skiing)

Your skiing may be a bit quicker than average but nothing to boost about.

You may be able to pass CSIA L1 on our local mountain since they don't take you to the ungroomed but if you take the course on Whistler and you skiingon ungroomed is so shitty, the chance of passing is ????????
我不急證,你說的這些問題剛好我在今年出發前解決掉了,懂得運用跟不懂的運用,想要進步快慢,差很多呢。

beg
文章: 2094
註冊時間: 週六 7月 10, 2010 12:08 pm

#84 回覆: Quiz

文章 beg » 週二 3月 29, 2011 3:34 pm

pku 寫:You said you can ski like the Italian demo video after praticing your roller blade trianing and is still a joke. Now you are boosting how far you improve again, I think you'll hide a bit longer and take care of you new noodle house. Earn more money and find a good trainer and ski more. Get some result first.
He never hide, he just use different name. :face (334): :face (334): :face (334):

頭像
snowrider
文章: 1329
註冊時間: 週五 3月 27, 2009 11:44 am

#85 回覆: Quiz

文章 snowrider » 週二 3月 29, 2011 8:47 pm

normanding 寫:我不急證,你說的這些問題剛好我在今年出發前解決掉了,懂得運用跟不懂的運用,想要進步快慢,差很多呢。
How about this ... let's not to discuss skiing here. Let's talk about your favorite - steak. You might know more on steak than us. My favorite ones are: rib eye and prime rib. How do you call them in chinese?

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#86 回覆: Quiz

文章 taichiskiing » 週二 3月 29, 2011 10:23 pm

snowrider 寫:How about this ... let's not to discuss skiing here. Let's talk about your favorite - steak. You might know more on steak than us. My favorite ones are: rib eye and prime rib. How do you call them in chinese?

I think that you've lost your marbles.

:)
IS

頭像
snowrider
文章: 1329
註冊時間: 週五 3月 27, 2009 11:44 am

#87 回覆: Quiz

文章 snowrider » 週三 3月 30, 2011 1:35 am

taichiskiing 寫:I think that you've lost your marbles.

:)
IS
No, I haven't lost my marbles yet. I just feel that it's very annoying when seeing 若置 irritating statements, especially when receiving his paranoid PM *teaching* me how to. What? Who does he think he is?

pku
文章: 3821
註冊時間: 週日 5月 30, 2010 1:02 pm

#88 回覆: Quiz

文章 pku » 週三 3月 30, 2011 2:29 am

snowrider 寫:No, I haven't lost my marbles yet. I just feel that it's very annoying when seeing 若置 irritating statements, especially when receiving his paranoid PM *teaching* me how to. What? Who does he think he is?
That's funny!

lelo
文章: 6011
註冊時間: 週三 10月 08, 2008 10:07 pm

#89 回覆: Quiz

文章 lelo » 週三 3月 30, 2011 2:37 am

skier888 兄大概是認為我這一題選 B 很沒 sense,才會介紹我看 essential 的書,我把我為什麼選 B 說一說 ...

我滑雪時腳跟不著地的,完全用脛骨在控制雪靴(可能不是"完全",但在朝這個目標邁進)。所以 ankle 是完全沒作用的,他們說要用 ankle 我就搞不清楚怎麼回事了 ...

既然是用脛骨在控制雪靴,能動的當然只有膝蓋,所以我就選 B 了!

Observer
文章: 71
註冊時間: 週一 1月 31, 2011 8:44 pm

#90 回覆: Quiz

文章 Observer » 週三 3月 30, 2011 5:39 am

lelo 寫:skier888 兄大概是認為我這一題選 B 很沒 sense,才會介紹我看 essential 的書,我把我為什麼選 B 說一說 ...

我滑雪時腳跟不著地的,完全用脛骨在控制雪靴(可能不是"完全",但在朝這個目標邁進)。所以 ankle 是完全沒作用的,他們說要用 ankle 我就搞不清楚怎麼回事了 ...

既然是用脛骨在控制雪靴,能動的當然只有膝蓋,所以我就選 B 了!
If "滑雪時腳跟不著地的" (heel lift), it means that your boots are too big or the brand is not suitable for you.

You must have minimum or NO heel lift to ski better.

頭像
skier888
文章: 1962
註冊時間: 週日 3月 14, 2010 1:57 pm

#91 回覆: Quiz

文章 skier888 » 週三 3月 30, 2011 8:14 am

lelo 寫:skier888 兄大概是認為我這一題選 B 很沒 sense,才會介紹我看 essential 的書,我把我為什麼選 B 說一說 ...

我滑雪時腳跟不著地的,完全用脛骨在控制雪靴(可能不是"完全",但在朝這個目標邁進)。所以 ankle 是完全沒作用的,他們說要用 ankle 我就搞不清楚怎麼回事了 ...

既然是用脛骨在控制雪靴,能動的當然只有膝蓋,所以我就選 B 了!
因爲 Observer 建議你練習轉彎 + steering. 請問你了解steering如何做嗎 :face (46): 我建議你看得原因是簡化學習的動作。只要一次做一個動作可以達成的,不需要做多餘的動作。DVD 有這個示範,書沒辦法。

可以試驗看看,站在地上,雙腳平行。 只彎膝蓋,你只能前後動,是無法改變雪板edge 的角度的。如果可以動改變的話,那你要看看還做了什麽動作

PSBoy
文章: 371
註冊時間: 週四 7月 15, 2010 3:24 pm

#92 回覆: Quiz

文章 PSBoy » 週三 3月 30, 2011 11:24 am

snowrider 寫:No, I haven't lost my marbles yet. I just feel that it's very annoying when seeing 若置 irritating statements, especially when receiving his paranoid PM *teaching* me how to. What? Who does he think he is?
It's quite interesting. Could you post the content for our 'learning'?

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#93 回覆: Quiz

文章 taichiskiing » 週三 3月 30, 2011 10:48 pm

snowrider 寫:No, I haven't lost my marbles yet. I just feel that it's very annoying when seeing 若置 irritating statements, especially when receiving his paranoid PM *teaching* me how to. What? Who does he think he is?
And you don't find that Whistler Group's shameless posting more irritating? What is your ethics standard?

Sacasm is not "professional" like, and you are a PSIA L1 coach. It is not wise to 「同流合污」 with shameless people.

:)
IS

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#94 回覆: Quiz

文章 taichiskiing » 週三 3月 30, 2011 11:00 pm

Observer 寫:If "滑雪時腳跟不著地的" (heel lift), it means that your boots are too big or the brand is not suitable for you.

You must have minimum or NO heel lift to ski better.

Not really, with proper "shin pressure," heels are normally off the bottom of the boots; in fact, steeper the hill, more heels lift should be, to make the body "perpendicular" to the slope. See if you can ski better this way.

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul



:)
IS

Observer
文章: 71
註冊時間: 週一 1月 31, 2011 8:44 pm

#95 回覆: Quiz

文章 Observer » 週三 3月 30, 2011 11:27 pm

taichiskiing 寫:Not really, with proper "shin pressure," heels are normally off the bottom of the boots; in fact, steeper the hill, more heels lift should be, to make the body "perpendicular" to the slope. See if you can ski better this way.

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul

:)
IS
This is only your way of getting the body perpendicular to the slope by more heel lift to compensate for it.

You are doing everything different to the established world of skiing. You have been doing this for so many years - good for you - you might as well continue to do it your way.

taichiskiing
文章: 3756
註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm

#96 回覆: Quiz

文章 taichiskiing » 週三 3月 30, 2011 11:57 pm

Observer 寫:This is only your way of getting the body perpendicular to the slope by more heel lift to compensate for it.
Yes, that's quite right, only if you know how the body mechanic works; nevertheless, how do you keep your body perpendicular to the slope?
You are doing everything different to the established world of skiing. You have been doing this for so many years - good for you - you might as well continue to do it your way.

Yes, high level skiing is kind of "anti-intuitive" to flatlanders' common sense, such as on the steep, move the body/head away from the hill instead of common sense lean on it, and dive with ski tips instead of set back on the tails, and etc.; just praise things opposite to what I do doesn't make an argument, more like a denial. Scientific truths do show the way.

:)
IS

Observer
文章: 71
註冊時間: 週一 1月 31, 2011 8:44 pm

#97 回覆: Quiz

文章 Observer » 週四 3月 31, 2011 12:35 am

taichiskiing 寫:Yes, that's quite right, only if you know how the body mechanic works; nevertheless, how do you keep your body perpendicular to the slope?
Yes, high level skiing is kind of "anti-intuitive" to flatlanders' common sense, such as on the steep, move the body/head away from the hill instead of common sense lean on it, and dive with ski tips instead of set back on the tails, and etc.; just praise things opposite to what I do doesn't make an argument, more like a denial. Scientific truths do show the way.

:)
IS
I guess you never really tried to understand any of the established modern skiing methods.

You invented your Taichiskiing, and criticize all other established ski schools, be it CSIA, PSIA, NZSIA or, for that matter, all ski schools in the world.

Besides your group of students, who else in the whole wide world ever believes in your theory/method?

You are preaching a 'cult religion'.

pku
文章: 3821
註冊時間: 週日 5月 30, 2010 1:02 pm

#98 回覆: Quiz

文章 pku » 週四 3月 31, 2011 1:54 am

taichiskiing 寫:Not really, with proper "shin pressure," heels are normally off the bottom of the boots; in fact, steeper the hill, more heels lift should be, to make the body "perpendicular" to the slope. See if you can ski better this way.

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul


:)
IS
小知小人:

We don't need to heels off to get shin pressure, too much shin pressure is not good for us recreation skier since we need to turn more across the fallline to control speed.

Show us a video you can make 30 link turns on the bumps or steep. :face (334): :face (334):
最後由 pku 於 週四 3月 31, 2011 6:56 am 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。

lelo
文章: 6011
註冊時間: 週三 10月 08, 2008 10:07 pm

#99 回覆: Quiz

文章 lelo » 週四 3月 31, 2011 3:21 am

skier888 寫: 可以試驗看看,站在地上,雙腳平行。 只彎膝蓋,你只能前後動,是無法改變雪板edge 的角度的。如果可以動改變的話,那你要看看還做了什麽動作
可以做 knee angulation,你膝蓋半彎,左右擺動,就是 knee angulation 了 ...

要做 knee angulation,膝蓋一定要彎曲的才行,可能有人會認為這樣不就後坐了,其實這還要配合正確的站姿,有一點難解釋 ....

頭像
skier888
文章: 1962
註冊時間: 週日 3月 14, 2010 1:57 pm

#100 回覆: Quiz

文章 skier888 » 週四 3月 31, 2011 9:40 am

lelo 寫:可以做 knee angulation,你膝蓋半彎,左右擺動,就是 knee angulation 了 ...

要做 knee angulation,膝蓋一定要彎曲的才行,可能有人會認為這樣不就後坐了,其實這還要配合正確的站姿,有一點難解釋 ....
你的回答完全吻合我說的,只是你沒把先後弄清楚。還有,你這個動作不是 knee angulation。我前面又說 knee angulation 的條件

回覆文章