taichiskiing 寫:典型的小知小人的反應，只會歪曲事實說人不好，卻不見自己無齒，無恥‧「人必自辱，而後人辱」, you are what you do, and your ways are what define you, shameless.
:)
IS
I got a lady co-worker, divorced and was about 40 when I worked in my company 10 years ago. She trained me in our computer system. She looked a bit younger than her actual age.
She liked to give a lot of compliment to herself and boast how good at work she was and how pretty she was. Now, after almost 10 years, she was still single, no boy friend, staying in the same position, no promotion.
When one is so over confident and don't look at one's weakness, improvement will be impossible.
Takes some time to look at your own skiing, compare to some well known great skier. See if there is some similarity in the turns ( don't just say you are both line skiing ) and show us.
pku 寫:I got a lady co-worker, divorced and was about 40 when I worked in my company 10 years ago. She trained me in our computer system. She looked a bit younger than her actual age.
She liked to give a lot of compliment to herself and boast how good at work she was and how pretty she was. Now, after almost 10 years, she was still single, no boy friend, staying in the same position, no promotion.
Male chauvinism/男性主義? What makes you think that she is even interested in your perception of life? She may or may not have problems, but the example is wrong analogy. You gapper only like to speculate bad things on others to show as though you're right, and that's what makes you lose sight of the reality, as well as the real knowledge, and that's what makes you a little knowledge/小知.
When one is so over confident and don't look at one's weakness, improvement will be impossible.
Yup, 自以為是, that is known in the skiing teaching business as "terminal intermediate (for students)/L2 (for instructors)," and you don't see that you are it with your limited skiing abilities? Talking about improvement, can you do tree, powder, and gully?
Takes some time to look at your own skiing, compare to some well known great skier. See if there is some similarity in the turns ( don't just say you are both line skiing ) and show us.
Look at the fluidity of my skiing, my skiing has no problems, the problems are in your skiing knowledge, experience, and disciplines, as well as in your head.
taichiskiing 寫:Male chauvinism/男性主義? What makes you think that she is even interested in your perception of life? She may or may not have problems, but the example is wrong analogy. You gapper only like to speculate bad things on others to show as though you're right, and that's what makes you lose sight of the reality, as well as the real knowledge, and that's what makes you a little knowledge/小知.
Yup, 自以為是, that is known in the skiing teaching business as "terminal intermediate (for students)/L2 (for instructors)," and you don't see that you are it with your limited skiing abilities? Talking about improvement, can you do tree, powder, and gully?
Look at the fluidity of my skiing, my skiing has no problems, the problems are in your skiing knowledge, experience, and disciplines, as well as in your head.
One thing is very obvious is no racer, mogulist, demonstrator, extreme skier, ski the way you ski. There must be a reason.
They may or may not ski like me (you don't know how they ski, given the way you observed my skiing), but is that my problem? No, I don't ski with their reasons, and Taichi Skiing is more than just a skiing technique, but also a martial art, a healing art, a healthy life philosophy, and more.
The fluidity is bcause the run is wide open, not steep and not bumpy. See you outside ski always skip out.
If you only try to "picking bones in an egg" you are not going to see what "'less is more' high end skiing" means, didn't you little knowledge see, I even use "inside ski turn," where outside ski may "appear" skidding out, as it actually has less/no weight on it?
They may or may not ski like me (you don't know how they ski, given the way you observed my skiing), but is that my problem? No, I don't ski with their reasons, and Taichi Skiing is more than just a skiing technique, but also a martial art, a healing art, a healthy life philosophy, and more.
If you only try to "picking bones in an egg" you are not going to see what "'less is more' high end skiing" means, didn't you little knowledge see, I even use "inside ski turn," where outside ski may "appear" skidding out, as it actually has less/no weight on it?
:)
IS
Let's discuss it from the other way.
Every skier got some problems in their skiing, of course I got a lot too. That's why I can't ski close to Richard Berger. You won't be an exemption.
You stand too tall which raise your center of mass a bit high and and didn't bend your lower body enough so it's hard for you to turn fast when slope is steep.
Inside ski turn is a good exercise but it's only an exercise. We need to balance on the outside once the skis pass the fall line to be more balance and make the next turn easier. You over rotate so makes the outside ski slip out.
Your gully skiing is smooth and you make use the gully to control the speed looks pretty good. If you can make some changes in your rymthm use less space and make the turns shorter and faster, then the skiing will look more exciting.
Ok, nevertheless, it sounds like a terminal L2's argument.
Every skier got some problems in their skiing, of course I got a lot too. That's why I can't ski close to Richard Berger. You won't be an exemption.
No, "everything is everything" won't make an argument, so, does Richard Berger have any problem with his skiing? Who is he? Any clip on his skiing outside of "linked short turns"? Yes, you have a very narrow view on skiing, but don't know it yourself, and that's your problem—you don't not know that you don't know.
You stand too tall which raise your center of mass a bit high and and didn't bend your lower body enough so it's hard for you to turn fast when slope is steep.
Under the gravity, what goes down must come up to maintain the balance, too much 拙力, rotate/angulate you hips is more energy efficient, and you don't do any better than me on bumps and steeps, so save your denial.
Inside ski turn is a good exercise but it's only an exercise. We need to balance on the outside once the skis pass the fall line to be more balance and make the next turn easier. You over rotate so makes the outside ski slip out.
Drills/exercises are for the uninitiated low end skiers, as they need to practice; nevertheless, they are "real" skiing techniques used by high end skier.
Your gully skiing is smooth and you make use the gully to control the speed looks pretty good. If you can make some changes in your rymthm use less space and make the turns shorter and faster, then the skiing will look more exciting.
The question remains, have you ever skied a gully before? Given that you only know "poled linked short turns," not sure if you know much about what "exciting skiing" is,
taichiskiing 寫:Ok, nevertheless, it sounds like a terminal L2's argument.
No, "everything is everything" won't make an argument, so, does Richard Berger have any problem with his skiing? Who is he? Any clip on his skiing outside of "linked short turns"? Yes, you have a very narrow view on skiing, but don't know it yourself, and that's your problem—you don't not know that you don't know.
Under the gravity, what goes down must come up to maintain the balance, too much 拙力, rotate/angulate you hips is more energy efficient, and you don't do any better than me on bumps and steeps, so save your denial.
Drills/exercises are for the uninitiated low end skiers, as they need to practice; nevertheless, they are "real" skiing techniques used by high end skier.
The question remains, have you ever skied a gully before? Given that you only know "poled linked short turns," not sure if you know much about what "exciting skiing" is,
skier888 寫:pku can ski bumps well. he won't have problem with gully. A 'high-end" skier like you should know that.
As a "high-end" skier I know he will have problem skiing "gully," as his "poled linked short turns" can only make "bumps" on the gully floor, and that's why skiing was banned on pipes/superpipes on the early terrain park days.
You wear down jacket or something? All your jackets make your upper body looks big and round.
That's caused by wind generated by the speed of the skiing, dumbo, and it is not just me,
What's the point to post the same boring video again and again in different topic. You just don't care your video is realated to the topic or not.That's even worst than your stink mouth. Enough is enough.
taichiskiing 寫:Ok, nevertheless, it sounds like a terminal L2's argument.
No, "everything is everything" won't make an argument, so, does Richard Berger have any problem with his skiing? Who is he? Any clip on his skiing outside of "linked short turns"? Yes, you have a very narrow view on skiing, but don't know it yourself, and that's your problem—you don't not know that you don't know.
Under the gravity, what goes down must come up to maintain the balance, too much 拙力, rotate/angulate you hips is more energy efficient, and you don't do any better than me on bumps and steeps, so save your denial.
Drills/exercises are for the uninitiated low end skiers, as they need to practice; nevertheless, they are "real" skiing techniques used by high end skier.
The question remains, have you ever skied a gully before? Given that you only know "poled linked short turns," not sure if you know much about what "exciting skiing" is,
taichiskiing 寫:Ok, nevertheless, it sounds like a terminal L2's argument.
No, "everything is everything" won't make an argument, so, does Richard Berger have any problem with his skiing? Who is he? Any clip on his skiing outside of "linked short turns"? Yes, you have a very narrow view on skiing, but don't know it yourself, and that's your problem—you don't not know that you don't know.
Under the gravity, what goes down must come up to maintain the balance, too much 拙力, rotate/angulate you hips is more energy efficient, and you don't do any better than me on bumps and steeps, so save your denial.
Drills/exercises are for the uninitiated low end skiers, as they need to practice; nevertheless, they are "real" skiing techniques used by high end skier.
The question remains, have you ever skied a gully before? Given that you only know "poled linked short turns," not sure if you know much about what "exciting skiing" is,
Skiing narrow gully is easy as you know how to use the higher sides to slow oneself down
Your name is famous not because of your high end skiing but your intermediate level skiing boosting high end skiing. Your unstable upper body shows you got caught by the resistant of the powder. Your tranverse show your low end skiing.
I know inside ski turns, one foot short turn skiing, rotating everywhere , just can't dare to say my skiing is high end.
Are talking about yourself, or Richard Berger? (I was asking how Richard Berger skis.) I remember my comment to your bump skiing was "good for recreational skiing, but not good enough for a L3," remember? You still lack of the dynamic, agility, and gracefulness of a [PSIA] L3, and the run is not a "gully."
pku 寫:Skiing narrow gully is easy as you know how to use the higher sides to slow oneself down
Of course, to slow the skis down without effecting the moving momentum IS a high end technique.
Your name is famous not because of your high end skiing but your intermediate level skiing boosting high end skiing. Your unstable upper body shows you got caught by the resistant of the powder. Your tranverse show your low end skiing.
Yup, that's all they said, yet, no one yet matches up my skiing, and whenever they were into a debate, they turned themselves into shameless denials. You Whistler Group is a typical example, started from Hong Kong board.
I know inside ski turns, one foot short turn skiing, rotating everywhere , just can't dare to say my skiing is high end.
taichiskiing 寫:Are talking about yourself, or Richard Berger? (I was asking how Richard Berger skis.) I remember my comment to your bump skiing was "good for recreational skiing, but not good enough for a L3," remember? You still lack of the dynamic, agility, and gracefulness of a [PSIA] L3, and the run is not a "gully."
Of course, to slow the skis down without effecting the moving momentum IS a high end technique.
Yup, that's all they said, yet, no one yet matches up my skiing, and whenever they were into a debate, they turned themselves into shameless denials. You Whistler Group is a typical example, started from Hong Kong board.
Yup, terminal L2.
:)
IS
No one can match up your skiing in the net world since you mouth never die But your skiing look so, so, so
No one here can agree with your highend skiing, why bother to convince us.
Richard Berger is on of the world top skier in the Demonstration type
The guy in the pink jacket suit, black jacket and yelow pants, red jacket and light grey pants, is him
"As some of you well know, I am constantly working on my skiing. I never use TTS teams or demonstrators as my model, it's too ineffective and underdeveloped and they show no refinement. If you are going to demonstrate skiing you had better do it not just well but make it exciting and energetic, not by popping up and down, by engaging the ski.I used to look at Richie Berger. He is still a great bump skier, but in other situations I don't use him as a model any longer. I use the best of the Japanese and Koreans. I'd probably use some Austrians, but I have yet to see any good ones on You Tube besides Richie."
pku 寫:No one can match up your skiing in the net world since you mouth never die But your skiing look so, so, so
That IS quite true; you can only plagiarize yourself by borrowing other people's clips, only to cover up that you cannot do it, typical shameless gappers on the net. So, it is your mouth never die?
No one here can agree with your highend skiing, why bother to convince us.
Of course, your little knowledge may not shed the light for you, but most likely, it is only your shameless denial.
Richard Berger is on of the world top skier in the Demonstration type
The guy in the pink jacket suit, black jacket and yelow pants, red jacket and light grey pants, is him
You are name-dropping, as you are far below from their levels. And I did ask for a clips that is NOT "poled linked short turns." Can he do trees, or more interestingly, "'chasing' in the trees"?
"As some of you well know, I am constantly working on my skiing. I never use TTS teams or demonstrators as my model, it's too ineffective and underdeveloped and they show no refinement. If you are going to demonstrate skiing you had better do it not just well but make it exciting and energetic, not by popping up and down, by engaging the ski.I used to look at Richie Berger. He is still a great bump skier, but in other situations I don't use him as a model any longer. I use the best of the Japanese and Koreans. I'd probably use some Austrians, but I have yet to see any good ones on You Tube besides Richie."
So, they are good bump skiers, but you think because that you're a good bump skier, too? You are plagiarizing, which proves also all you know is "poled linked short turns." Nowadays, I'm more interesting in speed and tree and powder skiing.
taichiskiing 寫:As a "high-end" skier I know he will have problem skiing "gully," as his "poled linked short turns" can only make "bumps" on the gully floor, and that's why skiing was banned on pipes/superpipes on the early terrain park days.
That's caused by wind generated by the speed of the skiing, dumbo, and it is not just me,
taichiskiing 寫:Are talking about yourself, or Richard Berger? (I was asking how Richard Berger skis.) I remember my comment to your bump skiing was "good for recreational skiing, but not good enough for a L3," remember? You still lack of the dynamic, agility, and gracefulness of a [PSIA] L3, and the run is not a "gully."
Of course, to slow the skis down without effecting the moving momentum IS a high end technique.
Yup, that's all they said, yet, no one yet matches up my skiing, and whenever they were into a debate, they turned themselves into shameless denials. You Whistler Group is a typical example, started from Hong Kong board.
Yup, terminal L2.
:)
IS
Your bragging has many holes.
You still turn but not very well.
You can jump, but you only do small jump. Can you do big jump?
You can spin, but can you jump and spin at the same time?
You avoid pk, more than once.
Don't use your age as your excuse. For someone like to take video as much as you do, I am sure you will have no problem producing something you did when you were younger.
You need to go outside Heavenly to see the world to get rid of your small Canadian dollar mind set.
taichiskiing 寫:That IS quite true; you can only plagiarize yourself by borrowing other people's clips, only to cover up that you cannot do it, typical shameless gappers on the net. So, it is your mouth never die?
Of course, your little knowledge may not shed the light for you, but most likely, it is only your shameless denial.
You are name-dropping, as you are far below from their levels. And I did ask for a clips that is NOT "poled linked short turns." Can he do trees, or more interestingly, "'chasing' in the trees"?
So, they are good bump skiers, but you think because that you're a good bump skier, too? You are plagiarizing, which proves also all you know is "poled linked short turns." Nowadays, I'm more interesting in speed and tree and powder skiing.
dd :)
IS
Just want to show you what is high end skiing. Nobody claim their skiing is high end here except you. It's not us doing the shameless denial, just you can't face the reality. Your skiing is good for a 60+ recreation skier. Can't consider good for a skier ski 100 days a season for many years.
Richard Berger can ski those bumps on one skis, of course without poles, jump on each bumps but you need to buy the video to see that. i know you won't pay to watch it since you won't spend money on something you'll be jealous. I watch his videos for more than 100 times. We won't be able to see his tree skiing since no professional camera man can catch up with his speed, his video is for sale, not for us to disuss. Not like you video, posting again and again and force us to watch.
skier888 寫:You are right! That does make you look like dumbo. The funny thing is you still look like dumbo when you are moving slowly.
Still playing cute on the 'net? Cute!
Who told you to make short turn on the floor
Can't read, eh, or in your shameless denial? Only "poled linked short turns" that cannot get onto the vert of the superpipe make short turns on the floor.
skier888 寫:Your bragging has many holes.
You still turn but not very well.
You can jump, but you only do small jump. Can you do big jump?
You can spin, but can you jump and spin at the same time?
You avoid pk, more than once.
They sound like a terminal intermediate's challenges— "cannot do it yourself but still shameless say others' valid skills are no good"—did I tell you shameless gappers are all the same?
Don't use your age as your excuse. For someone like to take video as much as you do, I am sure you will have no problem producing something you did when you were younger.
You need to go outside Heavenly to see the world to get rid of your small Canadian dollar mind set.
To produce other people's videos is not a problem, but to produce video clips on myself is quite a challenge, I haven't been able to find a person willing to chase me through the bump hills, would you be interested to fill in the gap? No, guess you don't qualify. So you think you know the currency exchange rate makes you a better skier?
