Quiz

[skier888]

Not really, with proper "shin pressure," heels are normally off the bottom of the boots; in fact, steeper the hill, more heels lift should be, to make the body "perpendicular" to the slope. See if you can ski better this way.

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul


:)
IS

cause and effect (因果關係）

"shin pressure" is the effect（果）. There are many ways to get the "shin pressure". One can be in the back seat and still get the "shin pressure". It does not mean you are doing it correctly just because you have "shin pressure". "shin pressure" is not the absolute result if you are doing it correctly.

[skier888]

Yes, that's quite right, only if you know how the body mechanic works; nevertheless, how do you keep your body perpendicular to the slope?



Yes, high level skiing is kind of "anti-intuitive" to flatlanders' common sense, such as on the steep, move the body/head away from the hill instead of common sense lean on it, and dive with ski tips instead of set back on the tails, and etc.; just praise things opposite to what I do doesn't make an argument, more like a denial. Scientific truths do show the way.

:)
IS

But .... you can't ski steep and you never face the fall line. You are perpendicular to the fall line, not the slope

[lelo]

你的回答完全吻合我說的，只是你沒把先後弄清楚。還有，你這個動作不是 knee angulation。我前面又說 knee angulation 的條件

什麼條件？能不能再引一下？

[taichiskiing]

I guess you never really tried to understand any of the established modern skiing methods.

You invented your Taichiskiing, and criticize all other established ski schools, be it CSIA, PSIA, NZSIA or, for that matter, all ski schools in the world.

Besides your group of students, who else in the whole wide world ever believes in your theory/method?

You are preaching a 'cult religion'.

There's no religion involved, that's to say that Taichi Skiing is verifiable by the science, that's why Taichi Skiing is so fundamental, it "covers" all your XSIA skiing methods, but not the vice versa.

Only little knowledge thinks Taichi is a religion.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

小知小人:

We don't need to heels off to get shin pressure, too much shin pressure is not good for us recreation skier since we need to turn more across the fallline to control speed.

Your mediocre bump skiing doesn't shed the light.

Show us a video you can make 30 link turns on the bumps or steep.

We did that already, didn't we? Show me you can make 30 link turns without using poles, can't? 對，小知小人的德行。

Gone skiing, sorry for you to get stuck on the flat land and pretend that you are skiing.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

cause and effect (因果關係）

"shin pressure" is the effect（果）. There are many ways to get the "shin pressure". One can be in the back seat and still get the "shin pressure". It does not mean you are doing it correctly just because you have "shin pressure". "shin pressure" is not the absolute result if you are doing it correctly.

That is only a little knowledge's understanding, and no, you cannot have the "proper" "shin pressure" with a backseated stance. And your 因果關係 are reversed.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

But .... you can't ski steep and you never face the fall line. You are perpendicular to the fall line, not the slope

Guess you don't really know what a "fall line" is?

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: carving on flat skis, Olympic Downhill, Heavenly



:)
IS

[pku]

Your mediocre bump skiing doesn't shed the light.



We did that already, didn't we? Show me you can make 30 link turns without using poles, can't? 對，小知小人的德行。

Gone skiing, sorry for you to get stuck on the flat land and pretend that you are skiing.

:)
IS

The bumps are on your left side, don't avoid them.

I never ask you to ski with poles why you care if I use poles or not.

If you can shoot a video making 30 turns in 40 second on the bumps field without poles from the front, no more boring shadow skiing, then I'll shoot one without poles.

[pku]

Guess you don't really know what a "fall line" is?

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: carving on flat skis, Olympic Downhill, Heavenly


:)
IS

Everybody know you can stay in the falline when the slope is gentle.

Once the slope get steep, you'll ski perpendicular to the falline.

One thing you do very good is to avoid the big bumps

[skier888]

There's no religion involved, that's to say that Taichi Skiing is verifiable by the science, that's why Taichi Skiing is so fundamental, it "covers" all your XSIA skiing methods, but not the vice versa.

Only little knowledge thinks Taichi is a religion.

:)
IS

sure, it is verifiable. I agree traverse is safer and slower low end skiing. You forget that you are still doing wedge turn which is considered intermediate is XSIA. You are just like norman

[normanding]

sure, it is verifiable. I agree traverse is safer and slower low end skiing. You forget that you are still doing wedge turn which is considered intermediate is XSIA. You are just like norman

連我都要講，真是無知的可怕呀！

[skier888]

連我都要講，真是無知的可怕呀！

你排名第一，所以你比較厲害

[Observer]

There's no religion involved, that's to say that Taichi Skiing is verifiable by the science, that's why Taichi Skiing is so fundamental, it "covers" all your XSIA skiing methods, but not the vice versa.

Only little knowledge thinks Taichi is a religion.

:)
IS

Only little knowledge thinks Taichi is a religion

I said 'cult religion' in the sense that you are trying to promote your taichiskiing method like it is a cult religion.

Taichi Skiing is verifiable by the science, that's why Taichi Skiing is so fundamental, it "covers" all your XSIA skiing methods, but not the vice versa.
It is one way and the way you like to ski, fine.

But the established skiing world and racing methods are all thoroughly researched and experimented (they even use wind tunnels to establish the tuck position etc for the downhill racers). So don't boast your taichiskiing which is only accepted by you and your students.
If it becomes a more accepted way of skiing by the majority, then come back and argue about it.

[taichiskiing]

The bumps are on your left side, don't avoid them.

I never ask you to ski with poles why you care if I use poles or not.

So you little knowledge doesn't know, when two different systems can do the same thing, i.e. having the same capabilities, the one with less requirements is better; that's only a common sense.

If you can shoot a video making 30 turns in 40 second on the bumps field without poles from the front, no more boring shadow skiing, then I'll shoot one without poles.

I thought we have been through this block before, something like "...無恥...看了都累..." thread. No, "making 30 turns in 40 second" is what we in this forum call it “雕蟲小技”, that is to say a technique that takes long time to practice, yet doesn't enhance the skiing over-all abilities, so it is quite sterile, and it is only little knowledge's "Holy Grail." And no, I don't think you can do the bumps/moguls without poles, let alone the "making 30 turns in 40 second" part. So you are only a little knowledge bragging about your little knowledge.

:)
IS

[skier888]

So you little knowledge doesn't know, when two different systems can do the same thing, i.e. having the same capabilities, the one with less requirements is better; that's only a common sense.



I thought we have been through this block before, something like "...無恥...看了都累..." thread. No, "making 30 turns in 40 second" is what we in this forum call it “雕蟲小技”, that is to say a technique that takes long time to practice, yet doesn't enhance the skiing over-all abilities, so it is quite sterile, and it is only little knowledge's "Holy Grail." And no, I don't think you can do the bumps/moguls without poles, let alone the "making 30 turns in 40 second" part. So you are only a little knowledge bragging about your little knowledge.

:)
IS

You are just guessing. You don't know pku can't ski without poles. You can't ski bumps/moguls without poles. That is for sure. You are barely surviving

[pku]

So you little knowledge doesn't know, when two different systems can do the same thing, i.e. having the same capabilities, the one with less requirements is better; that's only a common sense.



I thought we have been through this block before, something like "...無恥...看了都累..." thread. No, "making 30 turns in 40 second" is what we in this forum call it “雕蟲小技”, that is to say a technique that takes long time to practice, yet doesn't enhance the skiing over-all abilities, so it is quite sterile, and it is only little knowledge's "Holy Grail." And no, I don't think you can do the bumps/moguls without poles, let alone the "making 30 turns in 40 second" part. So you are only a little knowledge bragging about your little knowledge.

:)
IS

To ski on the bumps field you ski without poles is easy but to ski without poles on where you try to avoid is hard. That's why you always stay on the right side of the run where the bumps are small. Your video prove it already. Since you push foot technique is so poor that you can't take the hit of the big bumps.

看了都累, then please don't post your boring shadow skiing again and again. We all know you can go skiing everyday and you got the video camera that you can fix it to you helmet and take you boring shadow skiing everyday as much you want.

[beg]

You are just guessing. You don't know pku can't ski without poles. You can't ski bumps/moguls without poles. That is for sure. You are barely surviving

We might need to guess can PKU ski without poles but we don't have to guess can't Taichi ski with poles.


Now let's take a look why Taichi got kick out of PSIA L1 exam because of poles action,the poles is not functioning at all of him.
YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: Galaxy to Northbowl, Heavenly


Yup, good sking. Upper body rotation, swinging hands,inclination without angulation make you weight on inside feet. You do everything that we learn not to do it, good job.

[taichiskiing]

Everybody know you can stay in the falline when the slope is gentle.

Yes, that alone is a superior technique than your skiing.

Once the slope get steep, you'll ski perpendicular to the falline.

That's you “小人小知的自欺欺人”，you cannot go/ski down a slope just by "ski perpendicular to the falline" alone.

One thing you do very good is to avoid the big bumps

Yup, that's the right way of skiing, and you still have a lot of skiing to learn, as you become more matured.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

sure, it is verifiable. I agree traverse is safer and slower low end skiing. You forget that you are still doing wedge turn which is considered intermediate is XSIA. You are just like norman

So, you cannot even ski better than than a XSIA intermediate, but you think that you know better? Typical shameless little knowledge's mutated "better."

Norman has more 骨氣 than you.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

Only little knowledge thinks Taichi is a religion

I said 'cult religion' in the sense that you are trying to promote your taichiskiing method like it is a cult religion.

"When you put a squre peg into a round hole and call it 'fit,' you don't know either device."

Taichi Skiing is verifiable by the science, that's why Taichi Skiing is so fundamental, it "covers" all your XSIA skiing methods, but not the vice versa.

It is one way and the way you like to ski, fine.

But the established skiing world and racing methods are all thoroughly researched and experimented (they even use wind tunnels to establish the tuck position etc for the downhill racers). So don't boast your taichiskiing which is only accepted by you and your students.
If it becomes a more accepted way of skiing by the majority, then come back and argue about it.

You sound like a little knowledge try to hold on its status quo, sterile. There's a saying in high level skiing, "more is less, and less is more," see if you can figure that out; you have more to learn. And the same suggest for you, when you cannot ski as smooth as and as fast as Taichi Skiing, don't boast that you ski better, that's shameless.

:)
IS