taichiskiing 寫:“Something borrowed is nothing to brag about,” please don't show others' skiing to show as yours, you are nowhere near to their levels. Even thou he is good, but it is only a “drill,” and we all know “drill” is not skiing. The following clip is the “real” skiing, one legged skiing, “wrong edge turn.”Yes, he skis this way “normally.”
This guy was my trainer when I worked on Whistler before , stubborn old man.
There is a huge different between my trianer an your friend, My trainer gets up the new outside ski just after the transition and get back the ski on the snow after the fall line. This is way way more difficult than what your friend is doing. That's the difference between a real expect and self claim expect.
He won't ski like that normally. It's just an exercise and has the purpose as he said in the video. In real situation, one still be to pressure the new outside ski early and keep it on the snow all the way from turn to turn.
pku 寫: This guy was my trainer when I worked on Whistler before , stubborn old man.
No need to shout, we all can read perfectly. Shouting louder doesn't mean you know better.
There is a huge different between my trianer an your friend, My trainer gets up the new outside ski just after the transition and get back the ski on the snow after the fall line. This is way way more difficult than what your friend is doing. That's the difference between a real expect and self claim expect.
Not really, as my friend was not doing the “drills” his movements need not be so pronounced, so his skiing is much smoother.
He won't ski like that normally. It's just an exercise and has the purpose as he said in the video. In real situation, one still be to pressure the new outside ski early and keep it on the snow all the way from turn to turn.
Did you gappers just tell me that doing “drills” is not skiing?
Yup, I don't do “drills,” everything skiing I do is a skiing by itself.
norman 寫:早說了，是你有被害妄想症(管腦的問題)，你把我講的任何一句及持反意見都當挑釁，然後不認同你就算是沒禮貌， 那你還討論什麼？你乾脆說大家都聽你說就對啦，只要敢不認同你，反駁你的話，就是挑釁、沒有禮貌。所以你罵人是應該的，你以為你在這裏當老師呀？何況老師有是有好老師跟爛老師之分，只是我講話實在太事實刺人而已，你受不了而已啦。
Your friends skiing is quite smooth on easy groom, like you. No performance, speed is only so so. Speed is the by product of good skiing technique. His skiing technique is really so so.
Drills in ski teaching is not the way skiing should be. It just give somebody a feeling of one should feel if one did that. Sounds like you have no idea what drills means for ski instruction. The one who comment on your skiing long ago said an expert skier may consider your skiing as a drill and should be able to do it. That means your skiing is not a efficient way, not a good way.
PKU講話沒有“整体性”/lack of integrity，他的話在“証明”上沒有份量‧對，能滑兩條線並不表示那是“刻滑”，而你的“刻滑”弧度太大，你也不能控制你的滑線，你上了黑線，速度太快，你一定摔，或撞‧當你“不能”回答我的問題的時候，你就會亂問一些問題來掩飾你“不知道”，只是你不知道，明眼人一眼就看出來了，那只是你自己“不會”的煙幕‧你的答案實際上還是在說你“不會”/“不知道”‧對，我會刻滑，這是你的樣本‧
Your friends skiing is quite smooth on easy groom, like you. No performance, speed is only so so. Speed is the by product of good skiing technique. His skiing technique is really so so.
Or your insidious comments are “so so”? And skiing “quite smooth”anywhere IS good a “performance.”You deny it only because you cannot ski “smoothly.”
Drills in ski teaching is not the way skiing should be. It just give somebody a feeling of one should feel if one did that. Sounds like you have no idea what drills means for ski instruction. The one who comment on your skiing long ago said an expert skier may consider your skiing as a drill and should be able to do it. That means your skiing is not a efficient way, not a good way.
Not really, drills may solve a particular issue, nevertheless, may create some unseen problems later on in skiing developments, “Christie Turns” is an obvious example. The problem with that person is he has the “drills” in mind, and cannot see the “real” skiing. My friend cannot do you guys’“normal” skiing anymore. This IS his normal skiing.
PKU講話沒有“整体性”/lack of integrity，他的話在“証明”上沒有份量‧對，能滑兩條線並不表示那是“刻滑”，而你的“刻滑”弧度太大，你也不能控制你的滑線，你上了黑線，速度太快，你一定摔，或撞‧當你“不能”回答我的問題的時候，你就會亂問一些問題來掩飾你“不知道”，只是你不知道，明眼人一眼就看出來了，那只是你自己“不會”的煙幕‧你的答案實際上還是在說你“不會”/“不知道”‧對，我會刻滑，這是你的樣本‧
[quote=""taichiskiing""]Or your insidious comments are “so so”? And skiing “quite smooth”anywhere IS good a “performance.”You deny it only because you cannot ski “smoothly.”
Not really, drills may solve a particular issue, nevertheless, may create some unseen problems later on in skiing developments, “Christie Turns” is an obvious example. The problem with that person is he has the “drills” in mind, and cannot see the “real” skiing. My friend cannot do you guys’“normal” skiing anymore. This IS his normal skiing.
The fact is my skiing is quite smooth, not flawless though. I ski pretty fast for a weekend skier. It's not easy for a weekend skier to catch up my speed.
While your always need to side slip to slow down , transverse, rushing and forcing the turns. You can only ski trail smoothly but still with a lot is skidding. Losing energy , no performance , losing speed.
You try hard to get your skis very tight to each other ,almost stick together,to eliminate outside ski turn faster than inside ski （ most small wedge happen when outside ski turn first ) but at the same time, you lose the leg independence and also lose the mobility of your joints,
As you said ,you try to avoid one thing but many bad things happen because of this. You stand very straight, Cannot use your lower joints, thus no angulation, no performance , hard to deal with the forces, inefficient skiing. The consequence is slow skiing.
Although you got so many days on snow, your skiing is getting worse as you get older and older.
If that's your friend normal skiing, his skiing may be slightly better than 遊花園， nothing special for a guy ski everyday
#151 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週五 2月 13, 2015 2:15 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:The fact is my skiing is quite smooth, not flawless though. I ski pretty fast for a weekend skier. It's not easy for a weekend skier to catch up my speed.
No, you ski just like an average L2, unnecessarily aggressive, maybe better on bumps, for your Chinese group you look good, but for the skiing as whole, you are still at “practicing the forms” level/外功‧Speed comes with “clean” techniques, you have no way to catch up with me on a trail.
While your always need to side slip to slow down , transverse, rushing and forcing the turns. You can only ski trail smoothly but still with a lot is skidding. Losing energy , no performance , losing speed.
That is not true. It takes me awhile to figure out that you were only referring to my mogul skiing, even when you talked about my other skiing, and tried to bashing my other skiing with your mogul techniques is what makes youself a “tunnel vision,” I don't do your style skiing, so I don't have to use your techniques. My “Losing energy , no performance , losing speed” are only because your own “瞽盲不視”‧
You try hard to get your skis very tight to each other ,almost stick together,to eliminate outside ski turn faster than inside ski （ most small wedge happen when outside ski turn first ) but at the same time, you lose the leg independence and also lose the mobility of your joints,
What you've described is only your style's problems. The feet together stance is not just for the stylish of the “old school,” but it is also very functional. The problems you described only because you cannot do this stance. Feet together stance has one very distinguish advantage is that one doesn't have to move one's feet to change/shift weight [between feet], which IS the very foundation of “independent leg movements/controls,” and when one has learned to use one's hip joints/angulation, the use of knees is minimized. And the body stands upright so there's no joints are compressed, so they move freely. Your description has really missed a lot of good skiing techniques.
As you said ,you try to avoid one thing but many bad things happen because of this. You stand very straight, Cannot use your lower joints, thus no angulation, no performance , hard to deal with the forces, inefficient skiing. The consequence is slow skiing.
Not really, that is only your “瞽盲不視”again. And not to mention that beyond your forms, you don't really know what “angulation”or “performance” is, and by losing my poles, I lose not just the ungainly pole actions, but also gain a free flow movements of my body, thus enhanced performance. That is to say, you don't know what you're talking about.
taichiskiing 寫:No, you ski just like an average L2, unnecessarily aggressive, maybe better on bumps, for your Chinese group you look good, but for the skiing as whole, you are still at “practicing the forms” level/外功‧Speed comes with “clean” techniques, you have no way to catch up with me on a trail.
That is not true. It takes me awhile to figure out that you were only referring to my mogul skiing, even when you talked about my other skiing, and tried to bashing my other skiing with your mogul techniques is what makes youself a “tunnel vision,” I don't do your style skiing, so I don't have to use your techniques. My “Losing energy , no performance , losing speed” are only because your own “瞽盲不視”‧
What you've described is only your style's problems. The feet together stance is not just for the stylish of the “old school,” but it is also very functional. The problems you described only because you cannot do this stance. Feet together stance has one very distinguish advantage is that one doesn't have to move one's feet to change/shift weight [between feet], which IS the very foundation of “independent leg movements/controls,” and when one has learned to use one's hip joints/angulation, the use of knees is minimized. And the body stands upright so there's no joints are compressed, so they move freely. Your description has really missed a lot of good skiing techniques.
Not really, that is only your “瞽盲不視”again. And not to mention that beyond your forms, you don't really know what “angulation”or “performance” is, and by losing my poles, I lose not just the ungainly pole actions, but also gain a free flow movements of my body, thus enhanced performance. That is to say, you don't know what you're talking about.
I ski bumps, moguls just like i ski groom run, no special technique required. Not like you, you need to slide and try to avoid the big moguls. That show how bad your skiing is.
The way you ski those bumps got no rhythm and those bumps are melting soft slush. Automatic slow you down easily. For sure you cannot do that for a minutes and if snow is a bit harder.
yo don't use poles since you can use your hands can do some stupid movement so yo can claim that you apply Taichi on sking
As everyday skier, both your friend and you ski so low end. Compare with my friends who ski every days on Whistler, they all turn CSIA L4 who are really ski teaching professional.
#153 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週六 2月 14, 2015 11:46 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:I ski bumps, moguls just like i ski groom run, no special technique required. Not like you, you need to slide and try to avoid the big moguls. That show how bad your skiing is.
And your "groomed runs" are really under par for a L2. Yes, the ability to avoid big moguls is really the skills that you don't have, that's why you have to ski the mogul so hard, you can't last more than a minute.
The way you ski those bumps got no rhythm and those bumps are melting soft slush. Automatic slow you down easily. For sure you cannot do that for a minutes and if snow is a bit harder.
Of course, if you only have "one" way to ski moguls, you won't be able to see other “rhythms,” and this three minutes clip trumps all you less than one minute clips combined.
yo don't use poles since you can use your hands can do some stupid movement so yo can claim that you apply Taichi on sking
Yes, "stupid" mind can only see "stupid movements," and you don't know what Taichi movements are. Maybe my "three dimensional" skiing is too complicated for you to comprehend, see if the "flat" shadow is easier for you to see.
As everyday skier, both your friend and you ski so low end. Compare with my friends who ski every days on Whistler, they all turn CSIA L4 who are really ski teaching professional.
Your perpetuated little knowledge denials don't take you anywhere. As an ex PSIA clinician retired, my friend used to teach and train your L4s.
Your friend may be able to teach my friends ski 30 years ago.
Even Bob Barnes's skiing is not as good as my L4 friends, he should take a bumps skiing lesson from my trainer.
#155 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週日 2月 15, 2015 3:06 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:And your "groomed runs" are really under par for a L2. Yes, the ability to avoid big moguls is really the skills that you don't have, that's why you have to ski the mogul so hard, you can't last more than a minute.
Of course, if you only have "one" way to ski moguls, you won't be able to see other “rhythms,” and this three minutes clip trumps all you less than one minute clips combined.
My friend doesn't ski moguls, “mogul sucks,” he said, thou he has skied the most graceful mogul skiing I've ever seen. But none of you CSIA L4 can ski better or follow him in powder and tree skiing.
My bumps skiing is smooth and fast comapre with yours
#159 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週一 2月 16, 2015 2:23 pm
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:My friend doesn't ski moguls, “mogul sucks,” he said, thou he has skied the most graceful mogul skiing I've ever seen. But none of you CSIA L4 can ski better or follow him in powder and tree skiing.
A so call PSIA clinician says " moguls sucks" . How he can teach his students ski moguls.
This CSIA L4 skis moguls , powder just like skiing groom run but skiing with him needs a lot money. For sure you won't have that much money. Poor shameless old man
