Now you know how to see the problem with“wedge turn”？ Not a problem to her, she is not a “bumper,”doesn’t have to ski moguls so pretty, nevertheless, her run still a challenge to you, can you do a black diamond mogul hill for 6+ minutes non-stop?
Now you know how to see the problem with“wedge turn”？ Not a problem to her, she is not a “bumper,”doesn’t have to ski moguls so pretty, nevertheless, her run still a challenge to you, can you do a black diamond mogul hill for 6+ minutes non-stop?
初中級技術，滑 groom run 用parallel. 到難的雪道用 wedge turn, 所以只有白㾒的你才會用她來跟我比，我滑什麼麽都是paralle, outside ski tail so times slightly slide out 系動作未完善，不是wedge, 你連這點也不懂，白痴，
我滑 whistler ，你滑 Tahoe ，跟乜，白痴，
#150 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週三 1月 21, 2015 1:35 am
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:頑固不化的老人，她滑幾下，停一下，這樣也不算停，
鬥快滑雪就有，鬥滑一條雪道時間長，只有白痴才做，這樣一條run, 三分鐘已經滑完，
First, she didn't stop, that is, non-stop is non-stop. Second, yes, it takes skills to ski a black mogul hill “non-stop”with longest time (do you have the energy to finish is one of the questions). In non-competitive skiing, most average people go fast only because they cannot “control” their speed. And I don't think you can ski this run under three minutes, if you can finish it non-stop at all. “Ellie's”is the black run on the left of “Sky Express” lift.
初中級技術，滑 groom run 用parallel. 到難的雪道用 wedge turn, 所以只有白㾒的你才會用她來跟我比，我滑什麼麽都是paralle, outside ski tail so times slightly slide out 系動作未完善，不是wedge, 你連這點也不懂，白痴，
Nevertheless, aren't 30 degree slopes all the same inclining all over the world? Or you think that you Whistler's incline steeper, “白痴”？
:)
IS
#151 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週三 1月 21, 2015 9:27 am
由 norman
taichiskiing 寫:First, she didn't stop, that is, non-stop is non-stop. Second, yes, it takes skills to ski a black mogul hill “non-stop”with longest time (do you have the energy to finish is one of the questions). In non-competitive skiing, most average people go fast only because they cannot “control” their speed. And I don't think you can ski this run under three minutes, if you can finish it non-stop at all. “Ellie's”is the black run on the left of “Sky Express” lift.
taichiskiing 寫:First, she didn't stop, that is, non-stop is non-stop. Second, yes, it takes skills to ski a black mogul hill “non-stop”with longest time (do you have the energy to finish is one of the questions). In non-competitive skiing, most average people go fast only because they cannot “control” their speed. And I don't think you can ski this run under three minutes, if you can finish it non-stop at all. “Ellie's”is the black run on the left of “Sky Express” lift.
那 heavenly 那麼短的 vertical 又怎能代表你能滑1200米 vertical top to bottom. 那條 Olympic top to bottom 也不是真的由heavenly 山頂到山腳．又怎比得上 whistler round house to village 1200米的 top to bottom. 好明顯你是真正的白痴頑固老人
#155 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週三 1月 21, 2015 11:47 pm
由 taichiskiing
norman 寫:是不是大話，你找你老婆去一趟日本白馬八方，去滑雪旅遊順便再拍個你下直線饅頭的樣子，到時再來說是不是大話，不是比較可靠？
That is called “stopping without stopping,”an extension of “Wing-over” technique, you cannot see/understand this technique is the proof of “已經証明你滑雪修為非常有限”。
基本上兩條腿的人是沒有可能滑雪時兩隻雪板是 all the times parallel
Two skis are“all the times parallel” is an unnecessary requirement for parallel skiing. With the modern “shaped” skiing, when two edges are parallel, the skis are not parallel. Nevertheless, to keep them “parallel” are high level discipline.
No, not because you gappers develop a technical “name”—“日式饅頭”—then it becomes a super technique. If you really want to find how difficult “double diamond” runs are, try Breckenridge, Colorado's double diamond runs between the mountain peeks.
那 heavenly 那麼短的 vertical 又怎能代表你能滑1200米 vertical top to bottom. 那條 Olympic top to bottom 也不是真的由heavenly 山頂到山腳．又怎比得上 whistler round house to village 1200米的 top to bottom. 好明顯你是真正的白痴頑固老人
Long enough to see the technique works and prove that you are only a mid-level CSIA L2 bragging about a resort's statistic as technical skills, typical little knowledge, and a foul mouthed little character.
[QUOTE=taichiskiing;28564]That is called “stopping without stopping,”an extension of “Wing-over” technique, you cannot see/understand this technique is the proof of “已經証明你滑雪修為非常有限”。
Two skis are“all the times parallel” is an unnecessary requirement for parallel skiing. With the modern “shaped” skiing, when two edges are parallel, the skis are not parallel. Nevertheless, to keep them “parallel” are high level discipline.
No, not because you gappers develop a technical “name”—“日式饅頭”—then it becomes a super technique. If you really want to find how difficult “double diamond” runs are, try Breckenridge, Colorado's double diamond runs between the mountain peeks.
Long enough to see the technique works and prove that you are only a mid-level CSIA L2 bragging about a resort's statistic as technical skills, typical little knowledge, and a foul mouthed little character.
