taichiskiing 寫:Yes??? Scientific “proof” is determined by “logic,” and “holistic proof” is by “enlightenment.”
Or you don't know what a “proof” is? The physical proof is the ultimate proof.
Are you calling one human being as a physical proof?
taichiskiing 寫:Be humble, and get rid of your false beliefs, you may see the light.
「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」
No, here we are NOT talking about your CSIA “standards,”but “physics” of all the skiing, not the “minmum” but the “final” forms.
Taichi Skiing's standard—“physics”—is the highest standard of them all.
I love to talk with you using physics, but I'm still not sure whether you're qualify for that discussion. Go back to the other thread to answer those misleading info.
#182 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週二 2月 24, 2015 1:35 pm
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Of course, a CSIA L4 may be considered an expert and high end skier, but you're not, so you cannot speak for them. They may be good, but their skiing doesn't invalidate Lito's skiing, so they don't invalidate mine. You comment is a joke. Take a look how this old man uses his 50 year old truck; without good driving and car knowledge, your truck would not have last that long.
I formula 1 driving quite often can finsih the race because of engine break down but they are all considered drivers with good technique. Your example is already a stupid one.
Lito skiing si self learn but he still try to imitate the real expert. He uses pole. He is so much smarter than you shameless old man.
taichiskiing 寫:
That is to say, I have “studied” (作學問) on skiing for more than 30 years. You gappers' talking about“improving” is a joke.
:)
IS
You are not studying skiing. You just study how to make money from skiing using you poor skiing skill. Shameless old man
taichiskiing 寫: “技術本位”does need qialification documents, “技術本位”itself is already the qualification. By now I'm pretty sure that none of you Whistler group has indepth “mathematically and scientifically” knowledge or training. Your denial is the joke.
:)
IS
We got bachelor of science, master of science , doctor , pharmacist in our group.
What's your qualification? Shameless old man chopping wood
taichiskiing 寫:No, it is you green MA cannot see that there are no muscles to move those hands. Stupidity is on you.
:)
IS
You use too mcuh drugs and you even don't know what you are doing shameless old man
#183 回覆: 正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對
發表於 : 週二 2月 24, 2015 3:52 pm
由 beg
taichiskiing 寫:
“技術本位”does need qialification documents, “技術本位”itself is already the qualification. By now I'm pretty sure that none of you Whistler group has indepth “mathematically and scientifically” knowledge or training. Your denial is the joke.
