ams 寫:這我不能同意, 他大可以不說他能滑出 tfr, 說話既然出了, 有人要求證明是很合理的事情, 反過來說對方的不是似乎不合常理, 要不然任何人都可以吹得大大的, 我也可以說:

例如: 我會在平地上飛起十公尺, 只是我不要讓你看見.

您可以說您能做什樣的動作，但當您說可以做出另一派的動作時，您要代表什麼？

skier666 寫:Why do you want to listen to his half baked BS when you can learn from the source in English He will answer everything you ask even the ones that he knows nothing about

Thanks for your lovely gif that gives me a kiss today morning

Sure, I can learn from the source (actually I did). At the same time, I appreciate Norman very much because he has a warm heart to edit the video for helping me

norman 寫:下面這網頁最下面有影片，您再下戴來看好了，把橫橫重心轉換的部份去掉，我剪的那左轉跟右轉就是他們在變向完成後開始轉彎的樣子囉，只是我覺得他們的重心轉換的方式太粗暴了。

http://www.modernskiracing.com/technique_links.php

Thanks for your link and hints

PSBoy 寫:Thanks for your lovely gif that gives me a kiss today morning

Sure, I can learn from the source (actually I did). At the same time, I appreciate Norman very much because he has a warm heart to edit the video for helping me

So it is true you are his disciple

skier666 寫:So it is true you are his disciple

I think it is only my respect instead of his disciple (I do not have sufficient ability indeed).

norman 寫:您可以說您能做什樣的動作，但當您說可以做出另一派的動作時，您要代表什麼？

大師的理論有點太深奧了, 我作為一個學生有什麼學派不可以學的, 滑出來大家笑笑或評一下是很平常的事, 只要不要自認是什麼的 PMTS 大成, PSIA 大成 等等, 應該沒問題吧 大師你和 BB大師 的發言身份是大師, 言詞的份量和性質都不同, 不能一慨而論.