taichiskiing 寫:That means you know neither what is “angulation” nor “incline.” Flatboarding also use “inside ski turn,”as well as “open turn,”and in the clip there're also 270 degree turn, do you know where they are and what they are used for? You have much more need to learn.
Both timethe high C is so obvious, that's high end skiing
#42 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週六 1月 10, 2015 5:18 am
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:on 0:06, you lean inside the turn too much and your outside ski slip out. One should face the reality otherwise will be like you, a guy skiing for more than 30 can not make smooth turns other than gentle grrom runs
With recovery? That is “skillful.”And you can only see first 6 seconds in 2:41 min clip? yup, that's “Tunnel Vision.”
taichiskiing 寫:With recovery? That is “skillful.”And you can only see first 6 seconds in 2:41 min clip? yup, that's “Tunnel Vision.”
:)
IS
You need to do recovery so often even on a easy run. That's why you cannot ski smoothly once the terrain gets a bit difficult.
An expert only need to do recovery movement occasionally but an intermediate skier need to do recovery movement all the time. Although both people can get down the hill safely most of the time.
#45 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週六 1月 10, 2015 6:20 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:What you call “high C”/“high end”maneuvers, I call “拙力太多”‧ Real “expert skiers” don't do “high C,”only make smooth turns.
To be able to make the high C is the way of using the energy from turn to turn. That's the way of really making use of gravity and the equipment. That's what high end skiing , efficient skiing about.
pku 寫:You need to do recovery so often even on a easy run. That's why you cannot ski smoothly once the terrain gets a bit difficult.
Of course, if you only have the capacity to watch for 6 seconds, you wouldn't know what “smooth”really is, and you cannot even ski smoothly on an easy run. That's why you can only hide on a mogul hill to do your short turns to brag about it.
An expert only need to do recovery movement occasionally but an intermediate skier need to do recovery movement all the time. Although both people can get down the hill safely most of the time.
Yes, we have seen quite a bit of examples on this forum. Nevertheless, let's see what you can do?
pku 寫:To be able to make the high C is the way of using the energy from turn to turn. That's the way of really making use of gravity and the equipment. That's what high end skiing , efficient skiing about.
Not high end enough, you have to (or being forced) to “turn” to ski the high C, you have already lost the “forward” speed.
你不懂怎樣做當然會用很多力，所以人家是高手，而你只是個可憐自讚自的頑固老人
I don't have to ski that “hard,” and I don't have to "cheat" myself.
You don't know how to do so the fact is you cannot do it. Poor old man
#55 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing
發表於 : 週六 1月 10, 2015 6:57 pm
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Of course, if you only have the capacity to watch for 6 seconds, you wouldn't know what “smooth”really is, and you cannot even ski smoothly on an easy run. That's why you can only hide on a mogul hill to do your short turns to brag about it.
Yes, we have seen quite a bit of examples on this forum. Nevertheless, let's see what you can do?
