版主: norman
I think my short turns is good but still a long way to be 高手級，taichiskiing 寫:Short Turn Big White 2011-1 - YouTube
Good short turns, and pole-plants are good too, but you don't feel too tedious? My short turns begin @2:25,
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing - YouTube
and those turns are Wedeln, and Wedeln has no "traverse" phase of a "turn," so it is fast [turn].
:)
IS
要當高手很容易，你只要用想像的就可以了，這是大師的入門功pku 寫:I think my short turns is good but still a long way to be 高手級，
Skiing is hard to be a 高手， one needs to be trained and got a lot of days on skis
可惜我不是自戀狂，skier888 寫:要當高手很容易，你只要用想像的就可以了，這是大師的入門功
“不學不長”是學術上的“僵屍”，還用“僵屍的學術”來發言，“自欺欺人”/“妖言惑眾”，就變成了“僵屍的裹屍布”‧下面的發言是典型的例子‧pku 寫:裹屍布 ? 裹誰的屍，這麼不吉利，講來幹麼
:)skier888 寫:所以現在這論壇的滑雪技術排名是
- norman
- pku
- 女兒/level 0
- .
- .
- .
- .
- tcs
No, that is not my logic but your malicious insinuation. No, I didn't think/say "people" hate me, but "you gappers hate me, to pacify your own mutated egotism." I didn't say my life is perfect neither; nevertheless, what's my life is or isn't perfect meant to you, and need so much of your special attention?B2L2 寫:Sorry, I don't love you but at least I don't hate you. (your poor logic again) Why you always think people hate you? That alone doesn't make your life perfect.
No, that's too big a subject to discuss it here; nevertheless, you cannot "prove" that "god" exists, hence a "fake." Yes, all things are beliefs all right, just some beliefs "logical," some beliefs are not logical, and some beliefs only work/valid in a small/smaller domain, so it is "little knowledge"/小知識/小知; not all beliefs are the same. Physic knowledge covers the largest physical world, within its operating domain, the whole "world" is believing the scientific/logical truth is the TRUTH, so it is.Mind to prove my knowledge is "fake"? Mind to prove "god" is fake? Mind to prove that "莊子" is "real" and "true"? Everything is just about whether you believe or not.
How about you, have you done everything you want to do in life? And what have you done?Of course you could said you did everywhere you "want" to do. It was "you" defining what you "want" to do. Everyone could say that line too (if he/she want to). So in your logic, everyone could have a good life if he/she is willing to redefine what he/she "wants". I kind of agree that, but at the same time, there is nothing special in your life compare to any other.
It was you who talked about "Unism" and the state of "one with the universe". So I at least thought you want to have a perfect life. Ok, no, maybe that's not your plan.taichiskiing 寫:No, that is not my logic but your malicious insinuation. No, I didn't think/say "people" hate me, but "you gappers hate me, to pacify your own mutated egotism." I didn't say my life is perfect neither; nevertheless, what's my life is or isn't perfect meant to you, and need so much of your special attention?
No, that's too big a subject to discuss it here; nevertheless, you cannot "prove" that "god" exists, hence a "fake." Yes, all things are beliefs all right, just some beliefs "logical," some beliefs are not logical, and some beliefs only work/valid in a small/smaller domain, so it is "little knowledge"/小知識/小知; not all beliefs are the same. Physic knowledge covers the largest physical world, within its operating domain, the whole "world" is believing the scientific/logical truth is the TRUTH, so it is.
How about you, have you done everything you want to do in life? And what have you done?
You may think, but you know neither "Unism," nor "perfect," so you "thought" wrong. Want to prove yourself right? Define the terms you use then properly apply them. Don't think that you can do that neither; you are talking about something that you "don't" know, so yes, "which make yourself as a "little knowledge"/小知識/小知." Give you a hint, "Unism" is “一元,” meaning one element. Speaking of "perfect" (so there must be an imperfect, which makes Two,) makes two, which won't fit in Unism. Then, what's the "perfect" in Unism?B2L2 寫:It was you who talked about "Unism" and the state of "one with the universe". So I at least thought you want to have a perfect life. Ok, no, maybe that's not your plan.
No, I don't hate them, just dislike them, as they are cheating themselves to cheat the world, I only set them straight by telling them the truths, yeah, they hate that even more, and finally cracked, and “原形畢露,” all the honors go down to the drain; you Whistler group are typical example.So gappers hate you and you have to hate them. Don't be a silly kid. Sit back and think about who added fire to the "hateness". You are a part of this hateness game.
No, I did, but you gappers cannot read video properly, so you won't be able to see them, "which make yourself as a "little knowledge"/小知識/小知."So things apply to small domain is "little knowledge"/小知識/小知. Back to skiing, when we ask you to show your Taichi skiing skill to do some short turns in moguls, you said you don't do that. Does that count? Does that mean your skill or you could only apply in certain conditions, which make yourself as a "little knowledge"/小知識/小知.
It applies to me as well, just in you gappers "perpetuated denial" you gappers don't have the knowledge to understand how it applies. Give you another hint, I don't talk about something that I don't know, or have no experience about, or insinuation/"cheating oneself to cheat the world" those nonsense, so things that I talk about are always "true."Why everything you mentioned correctly doesn't apply to you? And why everything you complained always apply to yourself? Of course you wouldn't agree and that turns you into a shameless deny.
So you are jealous about my claims of my superior skiing skills and Unism bring about a superior life, so you bring up the Whistler group to bring me down by trash talks to show your own "superiority"? Yep, that is what I've figured, “小人以犯上為榮,” to "start on a discussion" for 4 years? Guess you have lost your chance; I have already learned what you CSIA can do, quite partitioned, so I'm no longer interesting in discussion.Why we pay special attention to you? If you don't claim yourself to be a ski expert, we probably wouldn't say anything about your skiing. If you then don't claim your skiing bring you to unism and how you're superior, I wouldn't say one thing about your life. There is always a start on a discussion.
No, that was only to check your "creditability," as I did with pku, and you both flunked. So, here's the comment for you Whistler group,Now why you're interested to know what I did in my life? Will that make your life more meaningful? Oh, I see, maybe you want to learn a few things from others now. LOL
Reilly Ski Training 2012.mov - YouTubepku 寫:Reilly Ski Training 2012.mov - YouTube
Quite similar to CSIA, look really similar to the Australian
Paul Lorenz Tryout Runs - YouTube
One needs to turn well and then have the ability to choose different line. The result is to be able to get down the hill fast . 高手taichiskiing 寫:Reilly Ski Training 2012.mov - YouTube
Paul Lorenz Tryout Runs - YouTube
Good example of "Turn Skiing."
:)
IS
You are correct, but you are talking about "line skiing." One must learn how to turn first before he or she can "apply" the technique to ski a line, and "line skiing" utilize the terrain to save energy and increases performance, which requires additional "mountain" knowledge, thus "line skiing" is a higher skill/technique than "turn skiing." And that's why the ski racing was developed from slalom to nowadays Super-G.pku 寫:One needs to turn well and then have the ability to choose different line. The result is to be able to get down the hill fast . 高手
You can "choose" your own line only in the bumps, because the "resolution" of the bumps quite uniform and matches your "turn radius," nevertheless, when you ski trails and flat terrain, your fancy short turns performance becomes your limitation, you have to turn with the "turning radius" of the skis, and you'll be out of balance if you don't follow the radius of the ski, so you turn back and forth to go where you want to go, and that's the essence of "Turn Skiing," so, you cannot choose your own line on the smooth groomers. "Turn skiing's" performance is limited by "turn radius" of skis.Just like skiing the bumps , we can choose our own line. I can't ski the fastest line cause my turning is good but need to be better to take that line
I can say that you are partly right. Once one know how to turn, that they start to find the line to get down the hill. There are so many skiers or riders on the slope and one must find a line down the mountain. A good skier can find a predetermined route, the line down the hill while a less skilled skier can only 見步行步taichiskiing 寫:You are correct, but you are talking about "line skiing." One must learn how to turn first before he or she can "apply" the technique to ski a line, and "line skiing" utilize the terrain to save energy and increases performance, which requires additional "mountain" knowledge, thus "line skiing" is a higher skill/technique than "turn skiing." And that's why the ski racing was developed from slalom to nowadays Super-G.
Sochi Olympics 2014 | Ted Ligety: Giant Slalom (GS) Skier's Unique Turning | The New York Times - YouTubeF
nevertheless, for us reactional skiers to pursue racing skills is "好高騖遠" pursuit, imo. I have too many times that I have to correct my friends' illfated carving technique, by teaching them "slipping turn" and proper line selection, to make them a "smooth" skier again. (Otherwise, they couldn't follow me through the trees.)
You can "choose" your own line only in the bumps, because the "resolution" of the bumps quite uniform and matches your "turn radius," nevertheless, when you ski trails and flat terrain, your fancy short turns performance becomes your limitation, you have to turn with the "turning radius" of the skis, and you'll be out of balance if you don't follow the radius of the ski, so you turn back and forth to go where you want to go, and that's the essence of "Turn Skiing," so, you cannot choose your own line on the smooth groomers. "Turn skiing's" performance is limited by "turn radius" of skis.
:)
IS
Are you happy nowtaichiskiing 寫:“不學不長”是學術上的“僵屍”，還用“僵屍的學術”來發言，“自欺欺人”/“妖言惑眾”，就變成了“僵屍的裹屍布”‧下面的發言是典型的例子‧
:)
IS
Ultimate shameless deny. LOL.taichiskiing 寫:things that I talk about are always "true."
Yes, here's some typical examples of "見步行步"/"turn skiing,"pku 寫:I can say that you are partly right. Once one know how to turn, that they start to find the line to get down the hill. There are so many skiers or riders on the slope and one must find a line down the mountain. A good skier can find a predetermined route, the line down the hill while a less skilled skier can only 見步行步
"A good skier should be able to carve or steer and even skid the skis on a smooth manner." So, what's "wrong" with this skiing again?A good skier should be able to carve or steer and even skid the skis on a smooth manner. If a guy only lock on the edges, for sure he can't considered a very good skier. A lot of inexperienced racers can only carve and skid in a rough manner when they can't carve.
I can see that, I already said that you a good bumper, but can you ski "smoothly" out side the bumps hills? Nevertheless, you cannot "follow" my line.I can ski the bumps in many ways, different lines according to the turns I made, depends on the condition and steepness of the runs. Snowrider skied with me and he saw that. Even with Snowrider, I didn't ask him to record my skiing although he got go pro on his helmets.
醜婆賣俏，弱慢族的爭論，弱慢族的“裹屍布”。skier888 寫:Are you happy now
- norman
- pku
- 女兒/level 0
- .
- .
- .
- .
- tcs
- beg
I did predict that you Whistler group would turn into shameless net-bashers when lost your arguments, even you are the leader of the group, yep, an ultimate shameful group; thanks for proving me right.B2L2 寫:Ultimate shameless deny. LOL.
弱慢族的爭論，弱慢族的“裹屍布”。Gone skiing. You enjoy your masturbation.
:)
Of course I can do better, much bettertaichiskiing 寫:Yes, here's some typical examples of "見步行步"/"turn skiing,"
Short Turn Big White 2011-1 - YouTube
and "line skiing."
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: powder day, Olympicdownhill, Heavenly, TTB - YouTube
And check out the "rounded tracks" that the skier left behind.
"A good skier should be able to carve or steer and even skid the skis on a smooth manner." So, what's "wrong" with this skiing again?
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: Pines, Heavenly - YouTube
I can see that, I already said that you a good bumper, but can you ski "smoothly" out side the bumps hills? Nevertheless, you cannot "follow" my line.
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: Olympic Pines, Heavenly - YouTube
Notice the "chaser" makes two turns for my one turn, @ around 1:13, 1:45, 1:55... Do you think that you can do better?
:)
IS
Of course, you should, but how much better? Can you keep the skier's image relatively same size through out the chase filming? Let's see it.pku 寫:Of course I can do better, much better
你喜歡滑trial ，我喜歡滑 bumpstaichiskiing 寫:Of course, you should, but how much better? Can you keep the skier's image relatively same size through out the chase filming? Let's see it.
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube
:)
IS
