我看上了這個, 可惜只有 161, 如果是 165 就好了.
http://www.levelninesports.com/Head-201 ... -Grey-Skis

ams 寫:我看上了這個, 可惜只有 161, 如果是 165 就好了.
http://www.levelninesports.com/Head-201 ... -Grey-Skis

不確定 Head Peak 82 是否有 165 cm.

Vicente 寫:不確定 Head Peak 82 是否有 165 cm.

No this length is provided.

I just order this

ams 寫:我看上了這個, 可惜只有 161, 如果是 165 就好了.
http://www.levelninesports.com/Head-201 ... -Grey-Skis

82 is too narrow. go with something wider, more fun

skier666 寫:82 is too narrow. go with something wider, more fun

yeah! i been wondering why people use skis as wide as like 100+. I saw many of them in Niseko but europe.

When I do regular skiing, I use my 170cm AC50 (128-85-112). When I do mogul, I use my wife's 156cm Attiva Tierra (118-76-104). Even AC50 is not powder ski, it floats.

ams 寫:yeah! i been wondering why people use skis as wide as like 100+. I saw many of them in Niseko but europe.

It is easier to ski off-piste and powder

snowrider 寫:When I do regular skiing, I use my 170cm AC50 (128-85-112). When I do mogul, I use my wife's 156cm Attiva Tierra (118-76-104). Even AC50 is not powder ski, it floats.

I see quite a few AC50s around.

skier666 寫:It is easier to ski off-piste and powder

How deep is considered powder when it obviously is helping the skier The best I experienced is knee deep in Niseko.

ams 寫:How deep is considered powder when it obviously is helping the skier The best I experienced is knee deep in Niseko.

That is deep! I will consider a day to be a powder day if the night before has 6" dump or more.

snowrider 寫:That is deep! I will consider a day to be a powder day if the night before has 6" dump or more.

thanks for sharing your view.

敗了