Norman - sorry that I am going hurt your feeling again.
If the skier in red is your idol, now everything makes sense to me about your skiing like a moving statue. His skiing won't even be able to pass our PSIA L2 standard.
To compare his mogul skiing with pku's, pku is 10 times better than Heckelman.
A freindly suggestion to you - not to waste your time and money on this Heckelman stuff. Otherwise, you will at most ski like him - looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one.
Note that at 47", Heckelman almost lost his balance on a bump because his CM did not catch up with his feet.
#3 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 12:39 am
由 pku
snowrider 寫:Norman - sorry that I am going hurt your feeling again.
If the skier in red is your idol, now everything makes sense to me about your skiing like a moving statue. His skiing won't even be able to pass our PSIA L2 standard.
To compare his mogul skiing with pku's, pku is 10 times better than Heckelman.
A freindly suggestion to you - not to waste your time and money on this Heckelman stuff. Otherwise, you will at most ski like him - looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one.
Note that at 47", Heckelman almost lost his balance on a bump because his CM did not catch up with his feet.
Thanks for you credit. It's still a long way for me to refine my skiing skill.
I can say his skiing is not modern and he moved his upper body up and down a bit too much on the bumps.
The way he ski on the bumps may be considered as an exercise for intermediate bumps.
I agree with you at 47" his balance is inside so he lost his outside skis a bit.
#4 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 12:41 am
由 PSBoy
Let him go! Otherwise, we will lose something very important.
You are partly right and parly wrong. Once, you got to more speed, you need to do bend more . It's a bit tiring but the situation call for it.
Standing like him is more relaxing and is good once we got tired but not good for quick turning with speed or ski fast on the steep.
His skiing is more for intermediate skier, not like the other idot if your Bernd Greber.
How you like to ski is your choice but skiing like Bernd Greber is considered super high end skiing but skiing like Martin Heckelman can only be considered as low advance level although he control well in his speed.
For myself, I can't ski like Bernd Greber but also don't want to ski like Martin Heckelman.
#6 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 4:58 am
由 taichiskiing
snowrider 寫:Norman - sorry that I am going hurt your feeling again.
If the skier in red is your idol, now everything makes sense to me about your skiing like a moving statue. His skiing won't even be able to pass our PSIA L2 standard.
Do you know why your trainer said you are not going to pass your L2? Poor MA reflects a poor skiing technique, experience, and knowledge, but mostly, lack of professionalism. I see his skiing, fluid, stable, and dynamic, better than some of your PSIA L3s.
To compare his mogul skiing with pku's, pku is 10 times better than Heckelman.
No ways, don't think that pku can keep up with him on the moguls, and so is the rest of his/pku's skiing compare to him.
A freindly suggestion to you - not to waste your time and money on this Heckelman stuff. Otherwise, you will at most ski like him - looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one.
I think you are too emotional and lose your objective; here's where you lose your professionalism, as comment as such "looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one" from a professional only makes the professional looks like a joke. "looking good to movie" is quite good already [to the western standards], why it is a "joke"? Given your PSIA L1 "coach" title, do you know the difference between "instructing" and "coaching"? after you.
Note that at 47", Heckelman almost lost his balance on a bump because his CM did not catch up with his feet.
You are nick-picking.
:)
IS
#7 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 6:08 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Do you know why your trainer said you are not going to pass your L2? Poor MA reflects a poor skiing technique, experience, and knowledge, but mostly, lack of professionalism. I see his skiing, fluid, stable, and dynamic, better than some of your PSIA L3s.
No ways, don't think that pku can keep up with him on the moguls, and so is the rest of his/pku's skiing compare to him.
I think you are too emotional and lose your objective; here's where you lose your professionalism, as comment as such "looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one" from a professional only makes the professional looks like a joke. "looking good to movie" is quite good already [to the western standards], why it is a "joke"? Given your PSIA L1 "coach" title, do you know the difference between "instructing" and "coaching"? after you.
You are nick-picking.
:)
IS
First of all, you have no clue how a person can pass PSIA level 2. Your PSIA L4 ifriend is a joke
Second, for sure I won't pass the PSIA L2 since I won't take it. But if you pay for it, then I'll reconsider.
Martin's demo on bumps is not good for modern skiing, you need to update your high end skiing knowledge.
#8 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 7:56 am
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:First of all, you have no clue how a person can pass PSIA level 2. Your PSIA L4 ifriend is a joke
I think so, the criteria for passing is posted on the web, isn't it? And the organization/certification process of PSIA is pretty much patterned after DOE, Department of Education's K12 teaching certificates. And you cannot take L2 exam if you don't have L1 cert.
Second, for sure I won't pass the PSIA L2 since I won't take it. But if you pay for it, then I'll reconsider.
At your current understanding and practice, even you take it, you won't pass.
Martin's demo on bumps is not good for modern skiing, you need to update your high end skiing knowledge.
That's only your terminal L2 speculation; here's a your CSIA L3's perform,
taichiskiing 寫:I think so, the criteria for passing is posted on the web, isn't it? And the organization/certification process of PSIA is pretty much patterned after DOE, Department of Education's K12 teaching certificates. And you cannot take L2 exam if you don't have L1 cert.
At your current understanding and practice, even you take it, you won't pass.
That's only your terminal L2 speculation; here's a your CSIA L3's perform,
Everyone know you bad mouth here so whatever you call me doesn't really matter.
The difference is so obvious anybody can tell.
It is so obviously Martin got his outside ski slip out especially in the fast big turns. since he got a wide stance, it's more obvious than you did. He got this thing happen on his short turns but just not as bad.
The CSIA guy turns are much rounder, less skiding. That's is partly due to the difference between the skis and partly because of the higher skiing technique of the CSIA guy.
The CSIA guy is a CSIA L4 and at least is a L3 course condutor. He is not CSIA L3 and 98% CSIA L3 can't ski like he did.
#10 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 6:48 pm
由 lelo
代 norman 貼回覆
snowrider 寫:Norman - sorry that I am going hurt your feeling again.
If the skier in red is your idol, now everything makes sense to me about your skiing like a moving statue. His skiing won't even be able to pass our PSIA L2 standard.
To compare his mogul skiing with pku's, pku is 10 times better than Heckelman.
A freindly suggestion to you - not to waste your time and money on this Heckelman stuff. Otherwise, you will at most ski like him - looking good to novie but actually a joke to professional one.
Note that at 47", Heckelman almost lost his balance on a bump because his CM did not catch up with his feet.
pku 寫:
You are partly right and parly wrong. Once, you got to more speed, you need to do bend more . It's a bit tiring but the situation call for it.
Standing like him is more relaxing and is good once we got tired but not good for quick turning with speed or ski fast on the steep.
His skiing is more for intermediate skier, not like the other idot if your Bernd Greber.
How you like to ski is your choice but skiing like Bernd Greber is considered super high end skiing but skiing like Martin Heckelman can only be considered as low advance level although he control well in his speed.
For myself, I can't ski like Bernd Greber but also don't want to ski like Martin Heckelman.
My skiing level will never be as strong as you on the net world. As long as you don't ski on the slope, you are the 2 of the best skiers on the here. Of course there must be some more in the net world.
You don't need to ask for Berd Greber's opinion since he died already.
Since you can't make any short turns on the bumps, then how can you see the difference between the L4 and Martin
Since you just came back, I won't be too hard on you.
#13 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週六 4月 30, 2011 10:52 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:Everyone know you bad mouth here so whatever you call me doesn't really matter.
So you think you wrongly accuse me "bad mouth" you, so you can pretend what I've said is not true, so you can overlook your own shortfalls? Shrewd. Nevertheless, 自欺欺人, on the 'net, your mind can go anywhere but arrive nowhere, that's why "terminal."
The difference is so obvious anybody can tell.
It is so obviously Martin got his outside ski slip out especially in the fast big turns. since he got a wide stance, it's more obvious than you did. He got this thing happen on his short turns but just not as bad.
The CSIA guy turns are much rounder, less skiding. That's is partly due to the difference between the skis and partly because of the higher skiing technique of the CSIA guy.
While they both can do pretty much each other's skiing, and have pretty much the "same" performance, but you think that a little rounder turns make you CSIA guy ski better? 小知小見. Why not because that CSIA guy has the better and newer "skis"? As the Martin guy used the inferior skis to do the "same" performance, doesn't that mean he skied better?
The CSIA guy is a CSIA L4 and at least is a L3 course condutor. He is not CSIA L3 and 98% CSIA L3 can't ski like he did.
Oops, each time you 狡辯, you put yourself into worse condition; the clip is saying it is the L3 "standards," and you say that "98% CSIA L3 can't ski like he did," but you don't think the Martin guy meets L2 standard? So, you just say anything to boost you own imagine, eh? The question is, when a person/client like Martin comes to your teaching session what can you teach him? So, the same question to snowrider to you, what's the difference between "instructing" and "coaching"?
:)
IS
#14 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週日 5月 01, 2011 11:59 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:So you think you wrongly accuse me "bad mouth" you, so you can pretend what I've said is not true, so you can overlook your own shortfalls? Shrewd. Nevertheless, 自欺欺人, on the 'net, your mind can go anywhere but arrive nowhere, that's why "terminal."
While they both can do pretty much each other's skiing, and have pretty much the "same" performance, but you think that a little rounder turns make you CSIA guy ski better? 小知小見. Why not because that CSIA guy has the better and newer "skis"? As the Martin guy used the inferior skis to do the "same" performance, doesn't that mean he skied better?
Oops, each time you 狡辯, you put yourself into worse condition; the clip is saying it is the L3 "standards," and you say that "98% CSIA L3 can't ski like he did," but you don't think the Martin guy meets L2 standard? So, you just say anything to boost you own imagine, eh? The question is, when a person/client like Martin comes to your teaching session what can you teach him? So, the same question to snowrider to you, what's the difference between "instructing" and "coaching"?
:)
IS
You need to see more CSIA instructors skiing. Whistler got more than thousand
As I reply to Norman, already said that the better skiing of The CSIA guy is because partly of the new equipment, Martin.s outside skis always slip out especially on Big turns.
You ask me instrucing and coaching, then you should know what's CSIA and CSCF first. You are only a lonely old man skiing by yourself all the time, you don't have any knowledge beside boosting your highend skiing. Small Canadian dollar, what a naive old man
At least do more reserch on the net, don't spend so mcuh time to bad mouth people once they don't agree with you.
pku 寫:You need to see more CSIA instructors skiing. Whistler got more than thousand
Why? You've already said that 98% of L3 cannot ski like him, what the rest of the thousands can do?
As I reply to Norman, already said that the better skiing of The CSIA guy is because partly of the new equipment, Martin.s outside skis always slip out especially on Big turns.
Not how I see it, care to point out where he made the "big turn" and where he "slipped" out? But mostly, that's only your "standard" excuse to deny a good skiing, as you have used the "same" tactic describing my skiing; nevertheless, I do know how I ski. My unanswered rebuttals have reflected your little knowledge's shameless denial.
You ask me instrucing and coaching, then you should know what's CSIA and CSCF first.
No, "instrucing and coaching" are standard practice to the western "pro" sport world, not just pertaining to your CSIA and CSCF organizations, terminal L2. nevertheless, let's hear it, you are the CSIA and CSCF guy, you tell us, what's your certificate says, "ski instrctor," or "ski coach"?
You are only a lonely old man skiing by yourself all the time, you don't have any knowledge beside boosting your highend skiing. Small Canadian dollar, what a naive old man
With all those garbages in your mind, no wonder you're stuck at terminal L2; no, those garbages are not the crieria for good skiing.
At least do more reserch on the net, don't spend so mcuh time to bad mouth people once they don't agree with you.
You are talking about yourself; of course, in your denial, you cannot see your own faults, so you cannot learn to correct them, so you're stuck like a broken record, on and on and on... retarded or what?
:)
IS
#19 回覆: Martin Heckelman動作影片
發表於 : 週一 5月 02, 2011 11:54 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Why? You've already said that 98% of L3 cannot ski like him, what the rest of the thousands can do?
Not how I see it, care to point out where he made the "big turn" and where he "slipped" out? But mostly, that's only your "standard" excuse to deny a good skiing, as you have used the "same" tactic describing my skiing; nevertheless, I do know how I ski. My unanswered rebuttals have reflected your little knowledge's shameless denial.
No, "instrucing and coaching" are standard practice to the western "pro" sport world, not just pertaining to your CSIA and CSCF organizations, terminal L2. nevertheless, let's hear it, you are the CSIA and CSCF guy, you tell us, what's your certificate says, "ski instrctor," or "ski coach"?
With all those garbages in your mind, no wonder you're stuck at terminal L2; no, those garbages are not the crieria for good skiing.
You are talking about yourself; of course, in your denial, you cannot see your own faults, so you cannot learn to correct them, so you're stuck like a broken record, on and on and on... retarded or what?
:)
IS
Whistler got the most CSIA L 4 in Canada
Tiger Woods has a coach not an instructor.
Martin skising is not bad, but not really special, Most CSIA L 4 can ski better than him.
You don't even got any certification, a terminal L2 is still mcuh higher than you get nothing.
You only can boost your skiing by your own created system.
