你說的沒有錯，我看的意思也是這個樣子，不過我在這裏面意有所指其他的事情。pku 寫:Since it's related to Martin's skiing, I transfer my reply to here.
I find it very simple to say the difference of Martin and PJ skiing.
If on ski like Martin to get into the PSIA or CSIA course for bump exam, he's not going to pass while PJ bump skiing can pass the highest level of the 2 association.
The guy in Epic is telling PJ's skiing is much more advance and his ability can ski all the ways all the way include Martin's way. If you understand Sking and English better, it is not hard to understand The guy said PJ skiing on bumps is a much more efficient way, ski the fast line.
The Way Martin ski is a slower, easier to control way but neither an performance way nor a fast way of skiing on bumps. Most skiers will need to ski like Martin once the condition is tough.
我說過了，重點在"granny line"，兩人滑行路線及方法有所不同，系統別不同，本來就有不一樣的地方。
而這兩者的差別就是，Martin的方法更容易讓學習滑雪的人進入基礎饅頭技術，如果你的基礎饅頭技術不好，不扎實的話，你的饅頭技術會更難進步，就像我之前說的，要先練完up unweight後，再練down unweight會比較容易，也比較不會練錯。而饅頭基礎技術沒完善之前，就想練滑藍線或黑線，只會讓人進步更慢而已。
我講這樣子，你看懂了嗎？我不是在爭論他們兩人的強弱，而當snowrider不了解時，就說Martin寫的教學書是垃圾之類的胡亂批評時，本身就已不客觀了。
在我即將完善滑走綠色路線後，藍黑滑線在我眼裏看起來已不難了，講了你是不相信的，不如等我哪天心血來嘲把直排輪再練六小時後，你看到後再說吧，要是沒想像力而看不懂，那你就慢慢等到我練滿九天後再說吧。
