差太多了,你們會不會看重點呀?我劃半天,你們還沒看出來呀?skier888 寫:
![]()

我不想跟你們提示,慢慢想吧?

版主: norman
最大分別是他已過世而我還在活生生跟你鬥咀norman 寫:差太多了,你們會不會看重點呀?我劃半天,你們還沒看出來呀?
我不想跟你們提示,慢慢想吧?![]()
你看錯影片啦,這劃的是我就算沒什收縮也不會像PKU一樣向後倒。B2L2 寫:Hmm.. all the red rectangles are the same size.. I see... that's right. No wonder I can't see any retraction or extension "AT ALL" thru your whole movement.
I thought in this video, you're demoing 收縮 for us. Where is your 收縮? I'm not picking on any minor mistake this time. I just talk about what you want to demo.
![]()
白癡即是白癡,你向前仆當然不會同時向後倒。norman 寫:你看錯影片啦,這劃的是我就算沒什收縮也不會像PKU一樣向後倒。
你們應該著重在這影片來看收縮,眼力不好沒關係,但不能這麼連我第一篇放的影片重點也不會看呀?我就只差沒像PKU講出那個字而已。
對了,那矩框你也看不出竅門,好好想吧,我不會提示你們的。
收縮釋壓06.wmv - YouTube
[你白癡的理論無謂講[norman 寫:你想得太偏激啦,不過我也不會提示你。![]()
我需要跟一個眼力沒救的人計較嗎?激我也不會跟你講?pku 寫:白癡即是白癡,你向前仆當然不會同時向後倒。![]()
![]()
![]()
norman 寫:我需要跟一個眼力沒救的人計較嗎?激我也不會跟你講?
如果這都叫向前傾,你的後倒問題是改不了啦,只能努力當蝦子啦。![]()
對了,這段的收縮,我也有做出來,只是太小,你看不出那一瞬間而已,你需要看大動作有差別才行。B2L2 寫:Hmm.. all the red rectangles are the same size.. I see... that's right. No wonder I can't see any retraction or extension "AT ALL" thru your whole movement.
I thought in this video, you're demoing 收縮 for us. Where is your 收縮? I'm not picking on any minor mistake this time. I just talk about what you want to demo.
![]()
This is what you said "第二段是過凸坡,只試了一趟就開拍了,這段是滑第三趟覺得可以了。第一趟過兩次試試看,一開始我的信心也不夠高,不過一試就發現真是簡單又輕鬆無比。第二趟就把彎縮小一點過三次,覺得不夠,第三趟過四次,第一次算起速就剪掉不看也罷。這最後一個上凸坡總該看得出我用的是標準的收縮動作了吧?"norman 寫:你看錯影片啦,這劃的是我就算沒什收縮也不會像PKU一樣向後倒。
你們應該著重在這影片來看收縮,眼力不好沒關係,但不能這麼連我第一篇放的影片重點也不會看呀?我就只差沒像PKU講出那個字而已。
對了,那矩框你也看不出竅門,好好想吧,我不會提示你們的。
收縮釋壓06.wmv - YouTube
你對怎樣劃線也不懂?norman 寫:放在相簿裏,把網址連結過來就好了,不過,我幫你做了下面這一張,你告訴我哪一張是向前傾的,另外,我那紅色長方形匡可是1:1複制相同大小的。讓你看看我的垂直性有多好,上坡過程沒後仰也沒前傾。真不知你的眼力是什麼看的。
It was you who said you're demoing 收縮 for us. Now you said you only show 太小, obviously you didn't do a good job.norman 寫:對了,這段的收縮,我也有做出來,只是太小,你看不出那一瞬間而已,你需要看大動作有差別才行。![]()
你學會怎樣劃線再說。norman 寫:你認為那兩張算前傾呀?
真是太慘了,自己想想看囉,我不會說明原因的。![]()
你混淆了,仔細看下面這一段,這是第三趟,也是最後一趟‧B2L2 寫:This is what you said "第二段是過凸坡,只試了一趟就開拍了,這段是滑第三趟覺得可以了。第一趟過兩次試試看,一開始我的信心也不夠高,不過一試就發現真是簡單又輕鬆無比。第二趟就把彎縮小一點過三次,覺得不夠,第三趟過四次,第一次算起速就剪掉不看也罷。這最後一個上凸坡總該看得出我用的是標準的收縮動作了吧?"
一試就發現真是簡單又輕鬆無比 : because you can't do it
這最後一個上凸坡總該看得出我用的是標準的收縮動作了吧? : tried 2+3+4 times and only the last one showed a bit of your "down motion turns"?
Your red rectangles are so wrong, why? 好好想吧,我不會提示你的.
你混淆了我在跟pku談的事情。B2L2 寫:It was you who said you're demoing 收縮 for us. Now you said you only show 太小, obviously you didn't do a good job.
Why don't you post this to epic instead. Just tell people you showed it 太小, and it is not your fault if they can't see it.
I know you like to argue "here" (and not any other place), but please use human reasoning.
你果然不懂norman 寫:劃矩框只是要證明這劃的線與地平面確實是垂直90度,沒其他特別用意。![]()
對了,這話是跟pku對話引出來的,但本來討論的重點就不在於收縮問題,雖我也講了我有做了一個小收縮,早在前面就已講過了,但我們是針對身體與地平面的垂直度,pku認為我向前傾,我用劃線了還看不出來,真是沒救的眼力了。B2L2 寫:It was you who said you're demoing 收縮 for us. Now you said you only show 太小, obviously you didn't do a good job.
Why don't you post this to epic instead. Just tell people you showed it 太小, and it is not your fault if they can't see it.
I know you like to argue "here" (and not any other place), but please use human reasoning.