Argument 201408

[pku]

這跟“為什麼”1+1=2 的道理一樣，“最基本的邏輯”最難‧跟norman一樣，你的邏輯事實上是“錯”的，連“一知半解”都不能算。



你跟norman也差不多，“只會”說，不能做也看不懂‧我滑雪的影片你看不懂就光看我身体的動作吧‧

旋股 - YouTube


“你”所有的滑雪我用這一個動作就夠了‧你知道的“上身不要搖動”只是口語，你不知道真正“上身不要搖動”是什麼‧在影片裡我的頭看起來是在動，為什麼我說我頭不動？你不知道、所以也做不到‧你慢慢想吧，等你有興趣找答案的時後在跟你說不遲‧我的上身不動的道理跟我頭不動的道理是一樣的。

:)
IS

偽太極老驢，你省點吧，你連我用那樣顯淺的三角幾何算出來的角度，你想也不想便說我錯，現在講什麼 1+1=2

老驢蹬腳，有什麼好看

叫人想乜想乜，不如你想想為什麼 Blake 的 natural form 都要拿著 poles 來滑。

[pku]

沒說poles沒有用，只是說“不用杖的滑雪”比“用杖的滑雪”技術高；好滑，也好學，初學者不用杖學的快，你也該聽過我教一對“從未”的年青夫婦兩天四課學平行滑雪滑藍線的故事吧？



既然不準，我是不會“捕風捉影”的，而滑雪時我追求“忘我無形”，我是不會去記/追尋這些數字的‧難怪你們不能專心滑雪，雜念太多。



前面已經說過了，是Snowrider不要滑mogul‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: wet skiing - YouTube


:)
IS

你笨學不會怎樣用poles ，當年我初自學滑雪時也覺得用 poles 是負擔，我滑了 幾天便可Parallel skiing on blue run , 那代表什麼，結果滑了十幾年用poles 仍未用得好,
而 poles 用得好時，上身更加穩定，節奏可更快，平衡會更加好

你用的 apps 不準，可找過準的，僞太極笨驢，

Snowrider 從來未跟我說過他不滑饅頭，所以我與他滑時也都是滑饅頭，唯一可能是他心腸好，見你技術差，又不好意思傷你心，便說自己不滑饅頭

[taichiskiing]

當年 Beg 重複又重複的發言，是怕你放屁又快又臭，重複又重複可避免正面交鋒，怕被你的僞太極老驢臭屁薰死

不是，是你們Whisyler group自以為多吃了洋飯就自已滑雪技術高，狗屁；不是beg “怕”我怎樣，而是你們Whistler group只敢躲在網路上罵人，“放屁又快又臭”，要辯論起來，“只敢”“重複又重複可避免正面交鋒”，而整個論壇已經被你們Whistler group臭屁薰的 into coma，是你們Whistler group “無恥”‧

Whistler group's 爭論, the making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

偽太極老驢，你省點吧，你連我用那樣顯淺的三角幾何算出來的角度，你想也不想便說我錯，現在講什麼 1+1=2

我是說過你連“那樣顯淺的三角幾何”都不會做，只會“作敝”‧對，為什麼 1+1=2是一個數學上最“深”的問題之一，跟太極滑雪在滑雪界的地位一樣，你驢頭的“賴驢打滾”的技術低級，是連邊都沾不上。

老驢蹬腳，有什麼好看

你小技小人看不懂，當然不好看。

叫人想乜想乜，不如你想想為什麼 Blake 的 natural form 都要拿著 poles 來滑。

不需要，我的太極滑雪比他滑的“更”natural‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube



:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

你笨學不會怎樣用poles ，當年我初自學滑雪時也覺得用 poles 是負擔，我滑了 幾天便可Parallel skiing on blue run , 那代表什麼，結果滑了十幾年用poles 仍未用得好,
而 poles 用得好時，上身更加穩定，節奏可更快，平衡會更加好

“結果滑了十幾年用poles 仍未用得好”已經說明了用poles的問題，它妨礙了你滑雪的發展‧我的學生只要兩天四課就可以滑“Parallel skiing on blue run”‧你只知道“poles 用得好時”會如何，那只是半個故事，或說“一知半解”的故事‧

“The parallel-skiing is based on the technique of parallel-turn. Due to the locked-heel bindings and stiff boots, parallel-turn has a more rigid structure than telemark-turn has. (Although less efficient, however, parallel-turn on loose-heel binding is the same as that of locked-heel binding.) In analyzing the parallel-turn techniques the skier finds that there are four definite phases to execute a turn: (1) pole-planting, (2) unweighting, (3) weight-shifting, and (4) traversing.

A parallel-turn begins at the end of the previous turn. The pole-planting marks the beginning of the turn. With the aid of the pole-planting, the unweighting follows. While unweighted, the weight is shifted from the downhill ski to the uphill ski and at the same time skis are pivoted into a new direction. By rolling the pressure off the uphill edges to the downhill edges, the traversing follows to finish the turn. If done in a precise and fluid manner, parallel-turn is a quick way to turn with little speed lost. However, it has its own share of problems.

In parallel-turn, poles are used as a timing device, and as a supporting device. However, used as a timing device, misusing a pole means a missed timing; used as a supporting device, miss-planting a pole costs the skier's balance.

The time and place they fail are usually when the skier needs them the most. In order to avoid such failures, the skier needs to pay attention to where and when the skier uses poles. While the skier needs all the concentration to ski the terrain ahead for an all-out performance, pole-planting diverts much needed concentration.

Meanwhile, carrying poles creates an aerodynamic drag which slows us down; during a turn, the three foot pole creates a undesirable leverage on the outside pole which holds the skier's outside shoulder back also delays turning, further contributes undesirable side effect. Poles have their places in downhill skiing, however, at times, they create more problems than they solve. the skier pays a high price for carrying poles.

Pole-planting also restricts down-unweighting; the natural consequence is up-unweighting. Up-unweighting fights against gravity, thus reduces momentum which reduces speed. Moving the body up and down also increases fatigue, and contributes instability in turning.

Weight-shifting can be executed only after first two steps are executed properly; otherwise, the skier would not have the balance to continue the turn, and weight-shifting would only compound the problem. Pivoting creates skidding, and skidding further reduces the speed.

After the weight is shifted to the uphill ski, the traversing begins by rolling the pressure off the uphill edges, and resetting it on the downhill edges (which are now the uphill edges in the coming turn) to change the direction of travel. Because the edge pressure is directly tight to the quality of the turn, the switch has to be decisive and precise.

During a turn, due to the skier's maneuvering pressure, the skis are arced upward. It is such arc that generates the turning force which causes the ski to change direction. If the skier relaxes the pressure on a ski, the ski bounces back, the arc is reduced, which changes the turning dynamic, the skier slows down and becomes unstable. The skier suffers a poor quality turn. If the skier maintains the pressure on the ski, the turning dynamic locks the skier in place, which makes fine directional adjustment difficult. The traversing needs to be executed more precisely still, so the skier will be able to arrive to a proper position to initiate the next turn. Due to the timing requirement on each phase, the whole turning sequence is complicated and difficult to execute properly. Parallel-turn leaves more to be desired.

Clearly, the culprit is the pole-planting. Due to the timing requirement of the pole-planting and the consequence that follows, the pole-planting depicts a very rigid structure for the skier to follow. To free the skier from such a restriction, a new style of skiing is evolved-Tai Chi Skiing. Tai Chi Skiing skis without poles. By not carrying poles, the skier is freed from the structure that is imposed on by the pole-planting; the skiing starts to lose its form and begins a new transformation.”—“Tao of Skiing: Principle and Techniques”—

http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_prin_tech.html

你用的 apps 不準，可找過準的，僞太極笨驢，

“既然不準，不需要去“捕風捉影””，你小技小人。

Snowrider 從來未跟我說過他不滑饅頭，所以我與他滑時也都是滑饅頭，唯一可能是他心腸好，見你技術差，又不好意思傷你心，便說自己不滑饅頭

你就不要躲在Snowrider的名字後面“假借他人之口”了，丟人，你自己自身難保就把朋友拉出來當你的擋箭牌是很沒義氣的事，你還說自己講義氣？自打嘴巴‧

“An arrogant friend is more dangerous than your enemies.”

:)
IS

[pku]

不是，是你們Whisyler group自以為多吃了洋飯就自已滑雪技術高，狗屁；不是beg “怕”我怎樣，而是你們Whistler group只敢躲在網路上罵人，“放屁又快又臭”，要辯論起來，“只敢”“重複又重複可避免正面交鋒”，而整個論壇已經被你們Whistler group臭屁薰的 into coma，是你們Whistler group “無恥”‧

Whistler group's 爭論, the making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)
IS

我們只是說你滑雪技術不高，我們從來沒說我們滑雪技術高，當然人家讚我們，我們不能阻止

在論壇跟你鬥是花很多時間，你退休，沒事做，所以最方便是重複又重複回話

論無恥，你偽太極是論壇第一

[pku]

我是說過你連“那樣顯淺的三角幾何”都不會做，只會“作敝”‧對，為什麼 1+1=2是一個數學上最“深”的問題之一，跟太極滑雪在滑雪界的地位一樣，你驢頭的“賴驢打滾”的技術低級，是連邊都沾不上。



你小技小人看不懂，當然不好看。



不需要，我的太極滑雪比他滑的“更”natural‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube


:)
IS

我明明算出來，你說我算錯
八英哩長，大約一仟公尺 vertical ，平均大約五度，
你說我不懂，事實是你連基本三角幾何也不懂，亂吹牛郤被我踢爆，

你滑得 natural 像散步，夠慢

Blake 滑得 natural 像跑步，夠快

[taichiskiing]

我明明算出來，你說我算錯
八英哩長，大約一仟公尺 vertical ，平均大約五度，
你說我不懂，事實是你連基本三角幾何也不懂，亂吹牛郤被我踢爆，

現在又不是用 apps 量出來的？“翻來復去”，你是很“不要臉”‧量角度是不用幾何的，所以你的“三角幾何”也是“偷聽偷抄”來的‧最後，show the works，我不認為你可以做得出來。

你滑得 natural 像散步，夠慢

逍遊，蕭灑。

Blake 滑得 natural 像跑步，夠快

那你呢？既不夠“蕭灑”又不夠快的“半吊子”‧很“卡”的樣子，不是？

:)
IS

[pku]

昨天半夜想了一下，我突然覺得，其實太介意的話，也不拘泥餐館的話？

其實在百貨公司地下小吃街是不錯的選擇，我看那裏有高檔的超市，賣日式料理生魚片，便當，各種都有，看起來就很漂亮又很好吃，可以順便買各類飲料喝，還個啤酒都行，想吃蚵仔煎，牛肉麵...之類的台式小吃都有，雖不能說最好吃的，但滿足六十分以上還是沒問題的。

這比在餐館吃的選擇多太多，圍成一桌就像辦桌啦。

Sorry to bother you,

please ask the 管理員，Taichiski 重複發言馬上刪除


引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
無恥人，無恥的辱罵‧

The making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)

[taichiskiing]

我們只是說你滑雪技術不高，我們從來沒說我們滑雪技術高，當然人家讚我們，我們不能阻止

不是，面對你們CSIA L4的技術，你們是“不能”說你們滑雪技術高；說別人高手的滑雪技術不高是你Whistler group“變相”的“自抬身架”，“自讚自”‧人家無知、虛偽、客套的讚美是沒什麼好標榜的‧“酤名釣譽”，你們Whistler group只是一幫子“鄉愿”。

在論壇跟你鬥是花很多時間，你退休，沒事做，所以最方便是重複又重複回話

論無恥，你偽太極是論壇第一

無恥人，無恥的辱罵‧

Whistler group's 爭論， the making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this “foul-mouthed”CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

Sorry to bother you,

please ask the 管理員，Taichiski 重複發言馬上刪除

Bwahahahahahahahahaha..... 好個“惡人先告狀”，你要是不是在這論壇上“重複”的“賴驢打滾”的“無恥人，無恥的辱罵”，你也不會被你自己“無恥的辱罵”“重複”的罵‧跟你說過，“自作孽，不可活”‧還說什麼自己講“義氣”，自己自身難保就拿無辜的朋友作你的擋箭牌，在公園裡耍小流氓被貶還“哭訴”“回家告媽媽”？你這種人不只是“不講義氣”，連“玩”都不值得一起玩。

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
無恥人，無恥的辱罵‧

The making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)

我還漏了兩個字，

The making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this “foul-mouthed” CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)
IS

[pku]

Bwahahahahahahahahaha..... 好個“惡人先告狀”，你要是不是在這論壇上“重複”的“賴驢打滾”的“無恥人，無恥的辱罵”，你也不會被你自己“無恥的辱罵”“重複”的罵‧跟你說過，“自作孽，不可活”‧還說什麼自己講“義氣”，自己自身難保就拿無辜的朋友作你的擋箭牌，在公園裡耍小流氓被貶還“哭訴”“回家告媽媽”？你這種人不只是“不講義氣”，連“玩”都不值得一起玩。



我還漏了兩個字，

The making of Whistler group's 裹屍布‧

And this “foul-mouthed” CSIA L2 turned Human Computer Virus crawls on.

:)
IS

我一早驚告你不要重複發言，這是這論壇的守則，當年 Beg 的重複發言被人刪除，你現在照做，我當然要投訴。

你偽太極老屎忽要放屁都要守規則

[pku]

現在又不是用 apps 量出來的？“翻來復去”，你是很“不要臉”‧量角度是不用幾何的，所以你的“三角幾何”也是“偷聽偷抄”來的‧最後，show the works，我不認為你可以做得出來。



逍遊，蕭灑。



那你呢？既不夠“蕭灑”又不夠快的“半吊子”‧很“卡”的樣子，不是？

:)
IS

我用的 app 是要到實地滑才可量，你講那八英哩雪道，用小小常識加基本三角幾何計出來，看來你仍是不知怎樣計

行路怎蕭灑也是行路，但你不是蕭灑，只是自然，一看便知是老伯行路

我是半桶水放在滴水的水龍頭下，將會是水滿桶

[taichiskiing]

我一早驚告你不要重複發言，這是這論壇的守則，當年 Beg 的重複發言被人刪除，你現在照做，我當然要投訴。

你偽太極老屎忽要放屁都要守規則

弱慢族的管理員，弱慢族的論壇‧

Thanks for the play.

Sierra/Tahoe living: fishing, rough catch and release, Indian Creek Reservoir, CA - YouTube



:)
IS

[pku]

弱慢族的管理員，弱慢族的論壇‧

Thanks for the play.

Sierra/Tahoe living: fishing, rough catch and release, Indian Creek Reservoir, CA - YouTube


:)
IS

玩遊戲便要守遊戲規則，當年 Beg 的留言被刪掉，又試過禁止他進入論壇幾次。

你現在不守規則當然要投訴你，合情合理。

在太湖釣釣魚，不要在這論壇放屁，

[taichiskiing]

玩遊戲便要守遊戲規則，當年 Beg 的留言被刪掉，又試過禁止他進入論壇幾次。

你現在不守規則當然要投訴你，合情合理。

在太湖釣釣魚，不要在這論壇放屁，

You're maybe a good skier, but I don't befriend with "shameless" people.

"An arrogant friend is more dangerous than an enemy."

:)
IS

[pku]

You're maybe a good skier, but I don't befriend with "shameless" people.

"An arrogant friend is more dangerous than an enemy."

:)
IS

你不需這樣講，我很小問朋友借錢。

[taichiskiing]

你不需這樣講，我很小問朋友借錢。

你連在網路上口頭鬥嘴都輸了不認賬，你認為我會相信你前面PK時$5,000塊美金的賭注的信用嗎？“Gapper's chanllege”。

:)
IS

[pku]

你連在網路上口頭鬥嘴都輸了不認賬，你認為我會相信你前面PK時$5,000塊美金的賭注的信用嗎？“Gapper's chanllege”。

:)
IS

你連 Norman 也辯不過，笨到爆

明天 whistler 開山，我就開季

你慢慢跟 Norman 辯

[taichiskiing]

你連 Norman 也辯不過，笨到爆

明天 whistler 開山，我就開季

你慢慢跟 Norman 辯

沒什麼好辯頭的，是你們弱慢族的“賴驢打滾”的功夫厲害‧這論壇說是滑雪人論壇，但是實值上跟Ski/Skiing magazines差不多，什麼話題都有，就是沒有“滑雪”的內容‧Lelo最近的討論串例外，但是只跟不會的人討論滑雪是跟比你差的人去滑雪一樣的，越滑/討論，知識、技術越差‧

Heavenly opened yesterday, but skiing is minimal—one run—and today is raining and on wind hold, boring stuff, go figure.

:)
IS