刻滑只能用在純刻嗎norman 寫:說它是廢技,是因為您要求在黑線純刻,而這個動作能應用範圍太少,能延伸技能的也不多,就某種方向來說,它算是一個動作鎖死,在靈活度及變化上最低。就是比賽也沒人用純刻吧?或是您去滑雪六天,您都在純刻嗎?不太可能吧?
(52):
刻滑只能用在純刻嗎
版主: norman
#1 刻滑只能用在純刻嗎
#2 回覆: 刻滑只能用在純刻嗎
聽說還有 brushed carve[不是卡] 也是刻滑, 但在大法定義中可能不是卡, 又或者是卡, 甚至不是卡.skier666 寫:刻滑只能用在純刻嗎


#3 回覆: 刻滑只能用在純刻嗎
您自己要求一定要高清深溝刻線,不是嗎?只要有刷的痕跡都不叫刻滑,這是您下的定義,您忘了嗎?:20070217220246:ams 寫:聽說還有 brushed carve[不是卡] 也是刻滑, 但在大法定義中可能不是卡, 又或者是卡, 甚至不是卡.![]()
![]()
-
- 文章: 3756
- 註冊時間: 週六 2月 07, 2009 10:28 pm
#4 回覆: 刻滑只能用在純刻嗎
The common argument in this issue is that although "brushed carve" meets the "definition" of carving [loosely, if they have one,] and looks like carving but it is not a "pure-carving." Carving's movements to setup or tipping the edges are unique, you can only do it or not do it; that's to say, if you do the tipping then you cannot do other kinds of sliding; of course, if you cannot hold on the edges, you may still slide off carving edges, no carving; but if you don't setup/tipping the edges at the begin of the turn, you will not be able to "pure carve" at all, so "brushed carve" is not carving, by the "definition" of the "pure carve."ams 寫:聽說還有 brushed carve[不是卡] 也是刻滑, 但在大法定義中可能不是卡, 又或者是卡, 甚至不是卡.![]()
![]()
:)
IS